I think there strategy heavily involves Finlands softening them up.
Mundane-Willow3036 on
I didn’t know the basic information needed to be surveyed but good ok thanks!
SpaceAnomalie on
We have good hardware and such. Just not enough of anything. Not people, not ammunition, not even boots. Its embarrassing.
Removing conscription was a mistake since it set us back so much.
h14n2 on
I don’t know about the army, but at least they make good hardware 😅
fonk_pulk on
I feel like we have a bias against Sweden and will rate everything they have as low-tier even if it isn’t. They should put that strong economy of theirs into work and train more troops though.
SnowyPine666 on
What do you mean? Swedes, the fierce descendants of vikings, will fight bravely to the last fin!
Hermit_Ogg on
Surprised:
onlywatchinghere on
Don’t trust public surveys. They bear little to no weight at all, non-zero. The stupidest thing is to ask a subjective opinion of a fairly objective matter. I suspect these are only made to either sell newspapers or to increse military spend (I’m not aware of who is behind this survey).
Tough_Physics8458 on
well why would sweden invest in their military when they know they would ahve to go through finland first
Unhappy-Lion4530 on
I don’t know who was asked for an opinion but at least as far as I know finns consider swedish materiel top notch, but they do not have enough personnel.
ProgrammerPlayful326 on
Swdish strenght is in marine and air, and artillery system along with coastal defencesystems that are unparalled in todays world, they just aren’t very well known here in Finland.
xeico on
air force and navy are solid. Army not so much. I guess they are working on that.
Salmivalli on
Finns also doesn’t know much.
I’ve understood that Sweden is strong where Finland isn’t and vise versa. Sweden has better airforce, navy and also half finished atomic weapon. Finland has artillery and other landwarfare
darknum on
Finland should expect 0 help from ANYONE. Finland must be ready by herself alone. If some country decides to actually help, great but planning on the condition of someone coming to save you is a dangerous national policy.
Especially a country who has absolutely 0 military experience. (Having tanks and planes is not experience. Their soldiers have not seen a single real fight probably in their collective lifetime.)
14 commenti
I think there strategy heavily involves Finlands softening them up.
I didn’t know the basic information needed to be surveyed but good ok thanks!
We have good hardware and such. Just not enough of anything. Not people, not ammunition, not even boots. Its embarrassing.
Removing conscription was a mistake since it set us back so much.
I don’t know about the army, but at least they make good hardware 😅
I feel like we have a bias against Sweden and will rate everything they have as low-tier even if it isn’t. They should put that strong economy of theirs into work and train more troops though.
What do you mean? Swedes, the fierce descendants of vikings, will fight bravely to the last fin!
Surprised:
Don’t trust public surveys. They bear little to no weight at all, non-zero. The stupidest thing is to ask a subjective opinion of a fairly objective matter. I suspect these are only made to either sell newspapers or to increse military spend (I’m not aware of who is behind this survey).
well why would sweden invest in their military when they know they would ahve to go through finland first
I don’t know who was asked for an opinion but at least as far as I know finns consider swedish materiel top notch, but they do not have enough personnel.
Swdish strenght is in marine and air, and artillery system along with coastal defencesystems that are unparalled in todays world, they just aren’t very well known here in Finland.
air force and navy are solid. Army not so much. I guess they are working on that.
Finns also doesn’t know much.
I’ve understood that Sweden is strong where Finland isn’t and vise versa. Sweden has better airforce, navy and also half finished atomic weapon. Finland has artillery and other landwarfare
Finland should expect 0 help from ANYONE. Finland must be ready by herself alone. If some country decides to actually help, great but planning on the condition of someone coming to save you is a dangerous national policy.
Especially a country who has absolutely 0 military experience. (Having tanks and planes is not experience. Their soldiers have not seen a single real fight probably in their collective lifetime.)