Grok immagini di bambini probabilmente non perseguibili, dice l’esperto di protezione dei bambini
https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/2026/01/11/grok-images-of-children-probably-not-prosecutable-says-child-protection-expert/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=bluesky&utm_campaign=HP-SubDesc
di Static-Jak
12 commenti
The Irish relegator won’t prosecute, no individual could afford to.
Much better to ban the platform it’s a fundamental part of. Freedom of expression can be continued elsewhere.
Anyone still on Twitter needs their heads examined, especially public figures, businesses, groups, clubs, schools and government departments.
Well even if we did prosecute then they would just end up in front of the usual judge who handles most Paedo cases and being left off with the “boys will be boys” defence.
If we have to debate “is AI CP / AI revenge porn illegal?” longer then 1 meeting we as a species fucked up.
Any government that has talked about protecting women and children on the internet but are afraid to take action against X should be called out on it every single day.
This isn’t speculative.
There was a somewhat notorious case a few years back of someone prosecuted for explicit cartoons. Now the person in question was already on the sex offenders list iirc, but the fact of the matter is that images of people don’t even have to exist, let alone be real and digitally altered, to potentially constitute an offense.
Bit difficult to argue about this story when one doesn’t really want to click on and examine the images.
We have proof a cabal of wealthy have been abusing children for decades and its barely affected any of them. Society seems to have decided child abuse isn’t that important
Just change the law to we can do it
You’ve been lied too, there is no child porn, the snowflakes are up in arms because people have been telling grok to put them in a bikini, or for Stamer a mankini, I’m probably too old to find this funny but I can’t stop laughing, it’s hilarious, I will get downvoted to oblivion but just saying, there is no child porn, and people can also do the bikini pictures using open ai, Gemini and the rest of them.
The government would have every right to walk into twitter headquarters in Dublin tomorrow morning and shut that shit down. It is a conscious, political decision not to do so in order to keep big brother across the pond happy, while his gestapo are gunning down and disappearing American citizens.
This part of the article citing the same expert argues opposite to the headline.
>However, Mr Moran said “nudified” images created by Grok without the subject’s consent may form part of a crime under the Harassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Act 2020.
>The Act, commonly known as [Coco’s law](https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/2024/09/27/almost-100-prosecutions-made-over-sharing-intimate-images-without-consent-since-law-enacted/), criminalises the sharing of non-consensual intimate images “with intent to do harm”. [or “being reckless as to whether or not harm is caused”]
With that news Grok will be longer at the top of the charts than Brian Adams