Londra cerca di accedere al prossimo round di finanziamenti per la difesa EU SAFE

London and Brussels are expected to resume discussions in early February on UK involvement in a future phase of the EU’s Security Action for Europe (SAFE) defence financing scheme, as part of a broader set of talks aimed at tightening UK–EU cooperation.

SAFE is the EU’s flagship joint-procurement loan instrument, designed to help participating states finance defence purchases on favourable terms while encouraging common buying across the bloc.

The European Commission describes SAFE as a €150 billion loan facility within its wider “Readiness 2030” defence package. In mid-January, the Commission said it had endorsed an initial batch of national defence plans and proposed that the Council approve financial assistance for eight member states, including Belgium, Denmark and Spain.

The UK’s interest is primarily industrial and strategic. British defence firms are major suppliers in European supply chains, and UK officials have argued that closer alignment on procurement would improve interoperability and shorten delivery times for munitions and other equipment.

The May 2025 UK–EU summit produced a security and defence partnership intended to widen practical cooperation, with both sides signalling at the time that it could support pathways for British industry to take part in EU-backed procurement.

However, the first attempt to secure UK participation in SAFE did not succeed. Talks broke down in late 2025 amid disagreements over the financial contribution London would make for access. Reporting at the time said the EU sought a multi-billion-euro entry fee, while the UK offer was in the hundreds of millions.

The question of “pay-in” has been a recurring feature of the post-Brexit reset agenda, and EU negotiators have framed contributions as a standard condition for third countries seeking access to EU frameworks.

A further complication is the design of SAFE itself. The loans are made to participating states, not to suppliers, and access for non-EU firms depends on the rules attached to eligible procurement and on any separate arrangement the EU concludes with a third country. Analysts have noted that SAFE’s third-country provisions are detailed and can constrain procurement choices, depending on how “European preference” conditions are applied in practice.

Separate debate inside the EU has also focused on the share of non-EU content that should be permitted in SAFE-supported projects, with press reporting in 2025 describing proposals that would cap the value of British components.

The renewed February talks are expected to sit within a wider UK–EU package. Officials on both sides have discussed issues ranging from security coordination to trade frictions and mobility arrangements, with the UK government seeking progress ahead of a further leaders’ meeting later in 2026.

The defence-financing question is therefore likely to be negotiated alongside other files where the EU may also seek UK financial participation, such as parts of the energy relationship.

Timing also matters on the EU side. SAFE is moving from legal adoption to implementation: member states submitted national plans by late 2025, and the Commission has begun approving the first wave.

In September 2025 nineteen member states had taken up SAFE loans, with Poland receiving the largest allocation, with first disbursements expected in early 2026 following plan submissions and approvals.

With funding decisions underway, any UK agreement tied to a “future round” would need to align with the EU’s budgetary and political calendar, including whether additional financing capacity is created beyond the current €150 billion envelope.

Glad this seems to be a direct response to the Greenland Crisis. It was sad the talks failed the first time, but I guess there is nothing like a rapidly destabilising superpower to clear heads.

So they want financial participation but limit British made components?

So we could pay in and get a percentage of that back in defence business. Why not just not pay in and use the defence business ourselves?

Let’s see what the asking fee is this time around from the EU..

Lame. The EU hasn’t learned from Brexit yet that the UK ought to be kept at arms’ length

I wonder how many tonnes of fish Macron will demand this time around.

France is all about European unity until it means that other countries get to benefit and participate as well, not just France. Then it’s French protectionism again.

Never ever will happen. The UK defence industry is too threatening to France’s nationally owned behemouths and its not exactly like the rest of Europe wants to help the UK out.

I knew before i even entered this thread it would be ripe with brits whining about france or the EU hating them

If Europe is serious about being a collaborative and strong region, this is a real no brainier. I suspect petty national interests will apply though.