That the officer had secretly recorded the sex encounter that turned into a rape, had it played at ***the victim’s*** trial hoping it would exonerate him, **and** the CPS still backing themselves, is absolutely disgusting.
WelshBluebird1 on
Obviously not a lawyer but I’m surprised him recording it without her knowledge or consent was legal?
asfish123 on
Can’t believe the CPS took her to court based on a recording they didn’t even listen to correctly.
Too busy falling over themselves to help their Police friends.
Alive_kiwi_7001 on
It surely has to be a case of perverting the course of justice (plus rape) for this guy now.
Express-Doughnut-562 on
Reading that every officer involved should be out of a job and up for perverting the course of justice. And the *alleged* (I mean we’re beyond that now) rapist should be in prison for a long, long time.
So often it seems the police make a decision on who they feel is guilty of a crime and then just seek evidence to fit. They decide their mate was a stand up fellow, so maliciously went after her. Sod what the evidence actually tells you.
And then for the barristers to presumably hear the actual audio recording and make the choice to not play it, knowing full well. There was a portion of the Lucy Letby trial often quoted in documentaries where she said in a statement that she was arrested in her dressing gown. The prosecuting barrister made a huge deal she was actually wearing a ‘Leisure Suit’ and that meant she was a liar and guilty. The trailer for a Netflix documentary with exclusive behind the scenes footage shows her being arrested… in her dressing gown, exactly as she said.
The fact that prosecutors just see it as fair game and ok to simply lie and bend the truth because doing so helps them get the right result is crazy.
5 commenti
Horrifying.
That the officer had secretly recorded the sex encounter that turned into a rape, had it played at ***the victim’s*** trial hoping it would exonerate him, **and** the CPS still backing themselves, is absolutely disgusting.
Obviously not a lawyer but I’m surprised him recording it without her knowledge or consent was legal?
Can’t believe the CPS took her to court based on a recording they didn’t even listen to correctly.
Too busy falling over themselves to help their Police friends.
It surely has to be a case of perverting the course of justice (plus rape) for this guy now.
Reading that every officer involved should be out of a job and up for perverting the course of justice. And the *alleged* (I mean we’re beyond that now) rapist should be in prison for a long, long time.
So often it seems the police make a decision on who they feel is guilty of a crime and then just seek evidence to fit. They decide their mate was a stand up fellow, so maliciously went after her. Sod what the evidence actually tells you.
And then for the barristers to presumably hear the actual audio recording and make the choice to not play it, knowing full well. There was a portion of the Lucy Letby trial often quoted in documentaries where she said in a statement that she was arrested in her dressing gown. The prosecuting barrister made a huge deal she was actually wearing a ‘Leisure Suit’ and that meant she was a liar and guilty. The trailer for a Netflix documentary with exclusive behind the scenes footage shows her being arrested… in her dressing gown, exactly as she said.
The fact that prosecutors just see it as fair game and ok to simply lie and bend the truth because doing so helps them get the right result is crazy.