quanto ci vorrà prima che me lo portino via… dicono che è destinato a contrastare gli approfittatori e i truffatori, ma non sono mai queste persone a soffrire alla fine

(Ho un difetto congenito e una disabilità associata, quindi questo mi sta a cuore)

https://www.hln.be/binnenland/wij-googelen-hun-adres-en-zien-luxevillas-artsen-trekken-aan-de-alarmbel-over-verhoogde-tegemoetkoming~ac98effc/

di naamingebruik

6 commenti

  1. Murmurmira on

    Again same story, 1 or 2 profiteers means the 100 poor have to get fucked?

  2. Helaas is dit gewoon slechte wetgeving. Als ik 10 cent teveel heb ben ik mijn VT automatisch kwijt. Maar het heeft jaren geduurd voor ik ook maar van het concept heb gehoord.

  3. autumnsbeing on

    They mention in the article “people see 3 specialistes for the same thing and it it only costs them 2 euro’s per visie but the Bill for the tax payer is huge”. Dude, if the first one actually helped, they wouldn’t need the next two, maybe work on that.

  4. Low_Builder6293 on

    Allez hop, heb nog geen jaar recht op verhoogde tegemoetkoming en de enshittify-motor genaamd “Jamaar de profiteurs!” is al weer in gang gezet.

  5. Mr-Doubtful on

    So like the article even mentions that 11% are considered in poverty while 20% get verhoogde tegemoetkoming, which implies 9% of Belgians are not poor while receiving this. How many of those are close to poverty do you think? I’m sure it’s quite a lot.

    As always, there’s certainly profiteurs. Introduce a means based system if you want, that’s generally fine, but I bet these doctors are annoyed by something different:

    That’s people who come to the huisarts, for basically no reason, probably just to talk, because they’re lonely or because they’re overly paranoid, or have nothing better to do.

    And yeah probably the ones for who it literally doesn’t cost anything, will have a few of those. And the doctors see those people a ton and are fed up with them.

Leave A Reply