Pubblicazione con una fonte RTS (francese)
25 avvocati svizzeri accusano il consigliere federale Ignazio Cassis di complicità nel genocidio di Gaza
I principali punti critici sono:
• Cooperazione militare in corso tra Svizzera e Israele, come ad esempio la compagnia d’armi Elbit Systems
• Investimento dalla Banca nazionale svizzera e dall’UBS in aziende che traggono profitto dal genocidio di Gaza.
• Tagli ai finanziamenti umanitari per l’UNRWA.
• Rifiuto di imporre sanzioni economiche come fatto da
Spagna o Slovenia.
https://www.rts.ch/info/suisse/2026/article/ignazio-cassis-denonce-a-la-cpi-pour-inaction-sur-gaza-par-25-avocats-suisses-29138665.html
di JaegerFl9
14 commenti
Respect
This is huge
They will lose easily, as there is no genocide. The IDF is fighting against Hamas, which uses civilians as hostages. There is no deliberate targeting against the ethnic group, so these 25 lawyers can go home, they already earned enough on this.
Ouch. That’s quite the charge…
I think it is more than time we stop hiding between this charade of « neutrality » to excuse low efforts and prevent any actual courageous actions
I don’t understand.
“25 Swiss lawyers charge federal councillor”
how? and with what? source? because the article you link does not say that.
so is it criticism or is it a charge?
which of those are crimes under what law?
[deleted]
Just yesterday a bunch of civilians where bombed in gaza and no mainstream media cared to report it
Translation: some people wrote a letter to the ICC complaining about Cassis.
They are taking an action to the ICC. Anyone can reach the ICC against anyone. Until the ICC decides to investigate the case it doesn’t move the needle one bit.
Astroturfers arise!
*”The foreign minister should have taken all steps at his disposal to prevent such crimes from being committed by [foreign nation]…”* is **not a reasonable standard** of criminal liability in international law.
We need a reckoning about the failures of our executive branch to uphold neutrality.
Frist step is leaving UN.
“What does protesting in Switzerland do for Gaza”.
This. It has public influence, it raises awareness and although not stated directly in this case, definitely has impacts we don’t see that lead to charges like this. Thankful for the right to protest, thankful to protestors and thankful that our civil liberties enable us to speak up for others who cannot speak for themselves.
How is there complicity in genocide without genocide proven?