>The serving Trump administration official, who like others in this piece was granted anonymity to speak candidly, said it was “common knowledge” that “no one was particularly favorable to him [Mandelson], really primarily because he’d been openly nasty about the president… [He had] a bad history of being openly nasty so why would he be a preferred ambassador?”
So that was the main concern?
Of course as we know Mandelson hit it off with Trump afterwards(for reasons we can guess) and actually did a good job of securing our interests in those first few months, particularly on the trade war.
FlaviousTiberius on
This does blow up the cope argument I saw from people saying Mandelson was appointed to deal with Trump even though it was kind of obvious Trump didn’t like him.
Turns out it was just Starmer bending to McSweeney’s wishes.
SP1570 on
This is as true as anything that comes from the White House nowadays…
Anyales on
The Whitehouse tried to stop an appointment because of Epstein links but aren’t investigating anyone for Epstein links?
The nonce in chief is no stranger to hypocrisy but fml
FuzzBuket on
“look we need to put this man in high office as whilst he’s probably fucking kids he’s got a relationship with the president”
“The president hates his fucking guts”
Another masterstroke by the plp. Such sharp political minds. It’s amazing that labours still convinced they won because of their mega brains and not as everyone hated sunak.
YouHaveAWomansMouth on
Over and over again I see people desperate to defend Starmer and McSweeney over this appointment, claiming it as some genius tactical move because Mandelson and Trump are linked by Epstein.
Fuck off with that. Genius tactical moves don’t blow up in your face a few months later and force you to resign yourself.
Mandelson was dodgy, they knew he was dodgy, they gave him a high profile job and to the immense surprise of Keir Starmer, Morgan McSweeney, and no other fucker on the planet, some more classic Mandelson dodginess came to light and Labour repeatedly got their arses kicked in the Commons and the press over it.
6 commenti
>The serving Trump administration official, who like others in this piece was granted anonymity to speak candidly, said it was “common knowledge” that “no one was particularly favorable to him [Mandelson], really primarily because he’d been openly nasty about the president… [He had] a bad history of being openly nasty so why would he be a preferred ambassador?”
So that was the main concern?
Of course as we know Mandelson hit it off with Trump afterwards(for reasons we can guess) and actually did a good job of securing our interests in those first few months, particularly on the trade war.
This does blow up the cope argument I saw from people saying Mandelson was appointed to deal with Trump even though it was kind of obvious Trump didn’t like him.
Turns out it was just Starmer bending to McSweeney’s wishes.
This is as true as anything that comes from the White House nowadays…
The Whitehouse tried to stop an appointment because of Epstein links but aren’t investigating anyone for Epstein links?
The nonce in chief is no stranger to hypocrisy but fml
“look we need to put this man in high office as whilst he’s probably fucking kids he’s got a relationship with the president”
“The president hates his fucking guts”
Another masterstroke by the plp. Such sharp political minds. It’s amazing that labours still convinced they won because of their mega brains and not as everyone hated sunak.
Over and over again I see people desperate to defend Starmer and McSweeney over this appointment, claiming it as some genius tactical move because Mandelson and Trump are linked by Epstein.
Fuck off with that. Genius tactical moves don’t blow up in your face a few months later and force you to resign yourself.
Mandelson was dodgy, they knew he was dodgy, they gave him a high profile job and to the immense surprise of Keir Starmer, Morgan McSweeney, and no other fucker on the planet, some more classic Mandelson dodginess came to light and Labour repeatedly got their arses kicked in the Commons and the press over it.
As tactics go, it’s not exactly Sun Tzu.