“L’Europa ha imparato la lezione sbagliata” raddoppiando l’uso dei combustibili fossili mentre India e Cina diventavano più “green”.
https://www.euronews.com/2026/03/20/europe-learned-the-wrong-lesson-by-doubling-down-on-fossil-fuels-while-india-and-china-wen
di Naurgul
25 commenti
We need to prioritise European tech for these projects
Nothing says “green” quite like generating most of your energy from coal.
[https://www.iea.org/countries/india/energy-mix](https://www.iea.org/countries/india/energy-mix)
India went green?
India green yeah sure buddy, what a shit article
I remember when Euronews webpage was readable and not full of cat food ads
Pretty sure China is feeling the pain from the sudden oil dip
One morning, I see Vance telling me how us in Europe fucked up by going green. Then I have this rag of a publication telling me Europe fucked up by going fossil. And here I am, wishing they’d all just fuck off…
In 2025 47.3% EU electricity generated was renewable, if you considered nuclear green as well, then it jumps to 71%.
In China renewables are ~35% and if you add in nuclear then it’s 42%.
Does anybody see the reality? 71% vs 42% which is higher?
India green, are you being deadass right now??
Nothing is green in India lol
Is this written by the opposite machine? 😂 Who owns euronoose again?
This must be the dumbest take I’ve seen all day.
One minute of “research” shows that renewables+ nuclear makes up 76% of EU’s energy production.
The comparable numbers for India and China is 50% and 56% respectively.
Hell, Latvia is 95% renewables.
Who “rushed back to fossil fuels” in Europe? Germany building LNG terminals as a reaction to Russia”s criminal war is seen as an indicator for that? Is this seriously the level of discourse these days? What would have been the alternative? Continue getting supplied via Russian pipelines?
Maybe that person should look at the massive increase in renewables in recent years, not just in Germany.
That doesn’t mean that you can replace natural gas from one day to the other, that’s just utterly stupid.
What the fuck is this article even?
BBBBBBBULLSHIT
Upper management is dumb is as fuck and too greedy to rake on the petrodollars from lobbyists.
Just my guess.
It’s not easy being green.
– Kermit
What kind of idiotic decision was it to label both gas and nuclear as ‘green’ in the EU Taxonomy? Even if they’re called ‘transitional’, putting fossil gas in the same category as low-carbon energy is wild and nuclear is low-carbon.
Europe has been a disgrace. They have removed people’s shoes while giving them nothing else to walk in
Even if you go green, you’re still tied to fossil fuels, a lot of materials are derived from fossil fuels and nobody is replacing those anytime soon as they’re cheap. Not to mention, China and India import a lot of oil, their entire industries run on it, not renewable energies like some seem to think on reddit.
Garbage publication.
Where is the source for this post?
As of early 2026, the European Union (EU) reached a major tipping point where wind and solar generated more electricity (30%) than fossil fuels (29%). While green energy now dominates the power sector, fossil fuels still maintain a significant, though declining, role in total energy consumption, including heating and transport, per European Environment Agency (EEA).
While China have built massive wind and solar power capacity – China also built more coal powered stations than the rest of the world combined last year or so. They aren’t reducing that fossil fuel consumption. If anything they’re probably just reducing oil dependency.
“europe”? why don’t we just say *Germany* instead?
Quite literally fake news.
Maybe the EU should add Euronews to their list of sites that spread fake news.