Studentessa ‘sorridente’, 13 anni, ‘ha pugnalato 143 volte la mamma di tre figli e poi ha scaricato il corpo’
‘Smiling’ schoolgirl, 13, ‘stabbed mum-of-three 143 times then dumped body’
di pppppppppppppppppd
Studentessa ‘sorridente’, 13 anni, ‘ha pugnalato 143 volte la mamma di tre figli e poi ha scaricato il corpo’
‘Smiling’ schoolgirl, 13, ‘stabbed mum-of-three 143 times then dumped body’
di pppppppppppppppppd
6 commenti
What the actual fuck. How is a 13 year old girl full of so much evil?
And she also set the house on fire by the sounds of it. Reminds of the James Bulger case a bit, although she’s a bit older than them
> Mr Skinner added: ‘She also researched what the sentence would be for a 13-year-old convicted of murder.
> ‘Whatever she might say now, we say that this killing was premeditated.’
> A motive for the murder may never be known, prosecution has said.
> The girl has admitted unlawfully killing Marta but denies murder by using the diminished responsibility defence.
> Mr Skinner said: ‘In truth this issue of diminished responsibility is likely to be the main focus of your attention in this trial because we, the prosecution, do not accept that she has the benefit of the defence of diminished responsibility.
> ‘We say that we will make you sure that this is a case of murder because she intended to do really serious harm.
> ‘We say it is murder because she planned the killing, and we say it is murder because she lied about what she did.
> ‘And we say it is murder because there are genuine specialists in this field of psychiatry and psychology that say her actions were not caused by poor mental health.’
She was also caught smiling when she was taken to hospital. It’s going to be hard work to convince anyone on diminished responsibility in this case.
Was the girl known to the victim? Why was she in her house ?
Diminished responsibility or not they’ll throw her in ashworth or an equivalent for life regardless.
The link has zero information about the events that lead to this ending.