Share.

    6 commenti

    1. chinkalichaczapuri on

      Giving nukes to people who declare their opa dindu nuffin in 1940s is like giving it to the monkeys.

    2. Downtown-Theme-3981 on

      “Canada, Germany, and Japan have proven track records of rational policymaking and domestic stability that will make both nuclear accidents and any spiral of uncontrolled escalation unlikely.”

      I get why they consider Canda and Japan as rational, but Germany? With russia as context here? lol

      And South Korea, Poland and Finland, Baltics would be dumb to not go for nukes in this scenario. Korea should do it long time ago, and others would end up as a buffer to get fucked for a price of deescalation in case of agression.

    3. TankedPrune5 on

      Not that I would exactly advocate for anything like that but considering the…. close german-russian relations shouldn’t ir be the other way around?

    4. Esamers99 on

      Doesn’t surprise me this policy position being advocated. American policy has shown to be steered between “completely useless” and “rationally counterproductive” when facing actual geopolitical threats. Most fearsome fighting force in the history of the globe to gear up for war with…. Venezuela. What a roster of foes defeated.

    5. ziguslav on

      That’s now that the article says. Downvoting for misleading title.

      “The European states that would have the greatest incentive to counter German proliferation—the United Kingdom and France—already have their own nuclear forces. Other possible proliferators, such as Poland, might be convinced to forgo an independent nuclear weapons program with multi- or bilateral nuclear sharing agreements.”

    Leave A Reply