My latest: British Defense Secretary John Healey said a Russian spy ship had entered the NATO ally’s northern waters and directed lasers at military planes sent to monitor it. He warned the Kremlin that “we are ready” if the vessel tries to travel further south.
By all means, do nothing. Just send a letter. That will show them
Pedrael on
Just keep ignoring. Maybe he’ll go away
Misztral on
Why is it always newsweek
teachbirds2fly on
Hope they are ready for a stern letter…
VigorousElk on
>”As I speak, a Russian spy ship, the *Yantar*, is on the edge of U.K. waters north of Scotland, having entered the U.K.’s wider waters over the last few weeks,” Healey said in a speech at Downing Street in London on Wednesday morning.
>”This is a vessel designed for gathering intelligence and mapping our undersea cables. We deployed a Royal Navy frigate and RAF P-8 planes to monitor and track this vessel’s every move, during which the *Yantar* directed lasers at our pilots.
So it didn’t ‘breach’ anything, the statement is purposefully vague and doesn’t talk about ‘territorial waters’.
‘Wider waters’ isn’t a legal or geographic term. International law knows the ‘territorial sea’ (12 nm from coastline, state has full sovereignty), ‘contiguous zone’ (24 nm, limited legal jurisdiction in some defined matters) and ‘exclusive economic zone’ (200 nm, includes contiguous zone, state has exclusive right for economic activity and use of resources, but cannot legally prevent anyone else from passage or even just chilling there).
The fact that the article talks only about ‘wider waters’ almost certainly means the ship hasn’t breached territorial waters. The real issue is using lasers against planes monitoring it, which is of course illegal. But being there probably isn’t.
No-Special-8335 on
Didn’t they damage anything? It’s okay then, let’s not get angry
Expensive-Alarm-8808 on
Russian drones and spy ships, and aircraft, all poking around NATO, just probing and probing. Inch by inch.
Meanwhile the UK wants to reno their barracks. Hmmm. We’re going to be, NOT surprised when it starts.
Jey3349 on
Ruzzian media said they’d detonate a nuke undersea to trigger tsunami so anything is possible.
atlasmountsenjoyer on
Russians seem to not be moved by a strongly worded letter anymore.
zanzara1968 on
Di you want to go to war,? To die in a trench filled with mud,?
12 commenti
My latest: British Defense Secretary John Healey said a Russian spy ship had entered the NATO ally’s northern waters and directed lasers at military planes sent to monitor it. He warned the Kremlin that “we are ready” if the vessel tries to travel further south.
Read more: [https://www.newsweek.com/russian-spy-ship-uk-nato-waters-laser-planes-11072250?utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=reddit_influencers](https://www.newsweek.com/russian-spy-ship-uk-nato-waters-laser-planes-11072250?utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=reddit_influencers)
[russia is not our enemy](https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/13/europe/pro-russian-posters-italy-intl-scli)
By all means, do nothing. Just send a letter. That will show them
Just keep ignoring. Maybe he’ll go away
Why is it always newsweek
Hope they are ready for a stern letter…
>”As I speak, a Russian spy ship, the *Yantar*, is on the edge of U.K. waters north of Scotland, having entered the U.K.’s wider waters over the last few weeks,” Healey said in a speech at Downing Street in London on Wednesday morning.
>”This is a vessel designed for gathering intelligence and mapping our undersea cables. We deployed a Royal Navy frigate and RAF P-8 planes to monitor and track this vessel’s every move, during which the *Yantar* directed lasers at our pilots.
So it didn’t ‘breach’ anything, the statement is purposefully vague and doesn’t talk about ‘territorial waters’.
‘Wider waters’ isn’t a legal or geographic term. International law knows the ‘territorial sea’ (12 nm from coastline, state has full sovereignty), ‘contiguous zone’ (24 nm, limited legal jurisdiction in some defined matters) and ‘exclusive economic zone’ (200 nm, includes contiguous zone, state has exclusive right for economic activity and use of resources, but cannot legally prevent anyone else from passage or even just chilling there).
The fact that the article talks only about ‘wider waters’ almost certainly means the ship hasn’t breached territorial waters. The real issue is using lasers against planes monitoring it, which is of course illegal. But being there probably isn’t.
Didn’t they damage anything? It’s okay then, let’s not get angry
Russian drones and spy ships, and aircraft, all poking around NATO, just probing and probing. Inch by inch.
Meanwhile the UK wants to reno their barracks. Hmmm. We’re going to be, NOT surprised when it starts.
Ruzzian media said they’d detonate a nuke undersea to trigger tsunami so anything is possible.
Russians seem to not be moved by a strongly worded letter anymore.
Di you want to go to war,? To die in a trench filled with mud,?