La Commissione europea accusata di “massiccia riduzione” delle protezioni digitali | Le modifiche proposte all’AI Act renderebbero più semplice per le aziende tecnologiche l’utilizzo dei dati personali per addestrare modelli senza consenso
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/19/european-commission-accused-of-massive-rollback-of-digital-protections
di xenodragon20
11 commenti
When money speaks louder than the digital rights and protections of your citizens.
The sad truth is: its either that or only be a user of ground breaking tech, never the inventor.
USA doesnt give a shit about its people, but they have tech. Its either infortunately. Never both
“we will fall behind on new tech” – no, we will fall behind on shitty LLMs that are trying to brand incorrect info as “hallucinations” instead of what it actually is; what they’re designed to do; make up text.
Anyone looking at “AI” and datacenters in the US and thinking that we need more of that is fucking insane.
EU can’t follow USA and make rights dependent on how much money you have, in other words: how many times you can sue some tech company that stole your intellectual or private property.
>After a long period of rule-making, the EU agenda has shifted since the former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi warned in a report last autumn that Europe had fallen behind the US and China in innovation and was weak in the emerging technologies that would drive future growth, such as AI. The EU has also come under heavy pressure from the Trump administration to rein in digital laws.
“AI” now is not some emerging technology, it’s the outcome of applying mountains of hardware and terabytes of data to machine learning techniques. As an analogy, the “AI” techno race is like a race to build the tallest skyscrapers. Sure, there’s some building innovation, but it’s not really major innovation or useful innovation, we already know how to build huge skyscrapers. The “innovation” they’re adding is burning large piles of money to scale up even more, as if the building the biggest tower would somehow reach another realm/dimension and invoke the reaction of a god (“”””‘emergence'””””).
If it was at least European AI companies scraping the data to induce growth, it would be a different matter. But in the end it’s just a handout to American companies.
Shirley the same people looking to scan everyone to “save the children” cannot at the same time collaborate with techbros overlords?
I want a fking list of every biotch saying the word “rollback” while making “accusations” cos to me it sounds like politicians LISTENING to the people they REPRESENT
Good
Almost like we bow to the usa…. Must be my immagination
If AI can’t be developed without using my personal identifiable information without my consent, then we don’t need AI.
It’s asinine to even say this, imagine if I put forward a project that required me to have your full name and address without your consent, you’d call me scum.