Il principale giudice della pianificazione afferma che i tribunali “non annullano gli sviluppi per meri tecnicismi”
https://www.thejournal.ie/top-planning-judge-says-courts-dont-quash-developments-over-mere-technicities-6889665-Nov2025/
di General_Z0
4 commenti
…. He said while quashing a development over a missing A4 sheet of paper on a wooden stick.
i mean hes correct , most planning decisions arent quashed for technicality ,. their mostly squashed for people not doing what the law says
and before anyone complains not following the law isnt a technicality
Yes. Developers break planning law and people on here blame “NIMBYS”.
[this is demonstrably false](https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/permission-for-e500m-wastewater-treatment-plant-must-be-overturned-high-court-rules-1041202.html)
>In his judgment on Tuesday, Mr Justice Allen said a “headline grabbing opening” of the case which stated the permission was granted without any consideration of what “would come out of the end of the pipe” was “simply and obviously incorrect”.
> The Environmental Impact Assessment Report and the board’s inspector dealt with that matter in great detail and the board’s decision “expressly spelled out” the conclusion the development would not result in a deterioration of the quality of bathing water or shellfish waters.
> On the argument the board failed to consult with the EPA as required under the Waste Water Discharge Regulations made under the EIA Directive, he found the board’s request to the EPA for the latter’s observations concerning the plant was based on an incorrect premise.
> The EPA was asked for its observations on the need for a waste water discharge licence but was not asked, as required by the regulations, for its observations on the likely “impact” of the discharges.