Share.

    25 commenti

    1. Gold_Motor_6985 on

      Brother ffs just make national insurance an actual card you can print or have on your phone. There. Solved. Wtf else you need???

      Edit: A commenter below makes a good point re identity theft risk.

    2. Silver_Adagio138 on

      If it’s going to £1.8B it’s really going to cost at least £3B.

    3. ProtonHyrax99 on

      As always, too skint to lift people out of poverty, or nationalise / invest in infrastructure, but plenty of money for the surveillance state.

    4. InsecureInscapist on

      That actually sounds pretty cheap. Almost suspiciously so.

    5. FoxtrotThem on

      Might want to update that to ‘priceless’; which is going to be on the the face of Labour MPs when they are ejected from governance in every consituency for this tyrannical farce.

    6. BaBeBaBeBooby on

      The Blair’s are laughing all the way to the bank. Tony has wanted this level of govt control for decades, and his son becomes even richer off the back of it. Ching ching, a very happy Xmas for the Blair family.

    7. The big 4 are salivating at the thought of this being signed off

    8. Significant-Leek8483 on

      Not worth it. We already have so many IDs , so many digital wallets. Just reuse.

    9. peanutbutteroverload on

      They still can’t answer how this relates to illegal workers who by the very nature of “illegal” working setups, do not follow standard hiring rules around ID / onboarding etc.

      You implement a digital ID, then what? If I’m in the business of employing illegally..I just don’t require digital ID……if these lot had a brain they’d be even more dangerous.

    10. XenorVernix on

      I’d love to see a breakdown of the costs as 1.8 billion is an enormous amount for what is essentially a software application. I’m a software engineer myself so I understand how these things work.

    11. ChocoMcChunky on

      They’ll claw it back when they sell the data and pretend it has been leaked or stolen

    12. ChocLobster on

      I mean, we *could* spend £1.8b on that or we could buy:

      90,000 dialysis machines to help people waiting for kidney transplants or

      60,000 advanced incubators for newborn babies or

      6,800 ECMO machines or

      600 top of the range MRI machines or if health care isn’t interesting enough we could fill 42,900 potholes.

      The list goes on and on. If there is £1.8 billion sat around somewhere waiting to be spent then there’s better things to spend it on.

    13. Fraggle_ninja on

      And which private company is getting the contract that’s linked to someone’s sister or cousin?

    14. Silver-Potential-511 on

      I had to do a double take, the B read like an 8 at first on my screen.

    15. In struggle to understand how it will cost that much. In an actually pro digital ID, but at that cost there are more fundamental problems about delivery that need to be tackled first.

    16. obsidian_razor on

      I just want a fucking official piece of plastic that says I am a real citizen to access public services and prove my identity. This whole project is Orwellian bullshit of the highest degree…

    17. ThatThingInTheCorner on

      Wouldn’t it be so much better to spend this on improving railways instead?

    18. A_friendly_goosey on

      So about £26 per resident, not sure if that’s good value for such a system and I guess long term its an “issue” solved that wont need to be revisited. I’m just not quite sure of what value it will bring at this exact moment when we’re in the hole financially. I’m not anti digital ID I’m just struggling to see the cost to value for a typical Brit.

    19. DavidDavidsonsGhost on

      I mean if this gets those private identity proving companies for stuff like Reddit and discord out the picture I might like that. However it’s a bit creating a problem to then have to solve it, to great a big brother state.
      I don’t want to provide reddit with my identity, but I don’t mind someone third party holding that info that can be unsealed under court order.

    20. Easy-Equal on

      Someone on labour or their mate must be in line to benefit as this is such a weird change considering how hard they objected to just requiring ID to vote and now they are in full support for required ID for just existing very strange

    21. TOMMYxGUNN on

      Their biggest decision will be on which friends and family to overpay to under deliver.

    22. LurkingUnderThatRock on

      Why the fuck are we outsourcing any of this. This is national infrastructure, we need a “digital department” that builds and maintains these systems. Same can be said for the NhS digital transformation, national rail ticketing, making tax digital… same can be said for our rail infrastructure, roads, these should all be government departments. Our civil service have just become glorified procurement managers who don’t understand the problems they’re solving while getting ripped off again and again by the private sector. We could even take on private contracts to generate revenue.

      The government should only be allowed to contract out short term projects and only a small number of times before they need to bring it in house.

      Edit:
      I say ‘why the fuck are we outsourcing this’ as based on their track record of outsourcing key digital infrastructure they probably will do.

    23. Never get how these things cost so much. That’s the equivalent of three thousand highly paid staff working on it full time for six years.

    24. I’d be fine with this, if the government commits to building an in-house engineering team for this problem instead of giving it to one of the WITCH companies. This would employ a ton of highly-skilled staff that’d happily build this over several years, then move on once delivered to other internal projects or companies.

      Although let’s be blunt, this price was already agreed, and the tender is a formality for the group that’s already getting the contract.

    25. AlixMair22 on

      I have a friend who is a hobbyist app developer and could do it on his spare time and make something no doubt more user friendly and more secure than what they’ll end up releasing…

    Leave A Reply