Close Menu
    Europa

    La flotta di sottomarini nucleari britannici “non è più adatta allo scopo”

    Share.
    View 16 Comments

    16 commenti

    1. CapableCollar on

      Telegraph has really been hammering the military lately.

    2. Royal-Hunter3892 on

      Is it right Britain got it’s Nuclear submarines from USA ?

      The name was project polaris right ?

    3. IamHumanAndINeed on

      Every EU forces has been underfunded for decades, no wonder we keep hearing things like this. No EU country is prepared for a full scale war as the cost of maintaining full readiness would be an enormous burden.

    4. oravanomic on

      Isn’t it an open secret that in case of conflict they would sail to Australia? j/k

    5. sisali on

      The replacements should have been coming into service in 2024, not 2032 like they are.

      Capital Megaprojects like ballistic missile submarines weren’t something the coalition gov wanted to put money into and let it sit.

      Another mess that was absolutely avoidable…

    6. Machiavelcro_ on

      One of the quietest reactor designs ever created, that can stay submerged for months, with some of the highest training standards in the world, is suddenly not fit for purpose.

      Ok.

    7. PathologicalRedditor on

      Can they strap them together to make one functional sub?

    8. estrellaente on

      If the Telegraph, which is so pro-UK, says so, I fear for the state those submarines will be in… 

    9. N0n3of_This_Matter5 on

      I wonder if all of these articles about how the US is going to abandon Europe or that Russia is about to attack, or that everything is falling apart; are really about taking money away from public programs that benefit society, and putting those funds for corporate welfare in the form of increased military-industrial contracts through war-mongering and inflating fears so that social programs are cut, thus creating the conditions for societal collapse and seeded by Russian disinformation.

      That is absolutely the longest sentence I’ve ever written.

    11. Alex_Strgzr on

      I would want to hear this from another source, not the Telegraph.

    14. Agitated-Airline6760 on

      The most important equipment within the UK SSBN – submarine launched ballistic missile – are all leased from US. So if Harry or Meghan piss off Trump, UK doesn’t even have any delivery vehicle for their nuclear warhead.

    15. lokicramer on

      The correct use is “on purpose” not for purpose.

      I even I know this.

    16. LuLMaster420 on

      Not sure if we should blame the immigrants, Brexit, or the lack of decent tea,
      but at least the subs are finally as functional as the government. 🇬🇧

    Leave A Reply