Close Menu
    Regno Unito

    Manager “incredibilmente disonesto” trascinato in tribunale dopo un curriculum pieno di bugie

    Share.
    View 8 Comments

    8 commenti

    1. pppppppppppppppppd on

      >”He had four previous convictions, including for a racially aggravated assault. The offence would have affected his role as a diversity and inclusion manager.”

      All dishonesty aside, what a truly bizarre role to apply for in the first place with such views. Almost seems maliciously intentional.

    2. henry_blackie on

      >He must complete 20 days of rehabilitation activity requirements, and a three month electronically monitored curfew.

      I don’t see how 4 weeks of training and not being able to go out in the evening for a few months is expected to punish or rehabilitate someone with multiple convictions for fraud and assault.

    3. SloightlyOnTheHuh on

      Puzzled how he was allowed to start work without actual reference from employers not some bullshit letters. I have repeatedly refused to write letters of recommendation for ex employees because they’re too easy to modify. I expect prospective employers to contact me then I’ll send a glowing reference. Someone in HR should be stacked over this but if course HR are in charge of hiring and firing so…..

    4. recursant on

      >A man who got a job working as a hospital’s diversion and inclusivity manager has been hauled before [a court](https://www.mirror.co.uk/all-about/crown-court) after failing to tell bosses he had a conviction for racially aggravated assault.

      He seems like an ideal person for the role of diversion and inclusivity manager.

      Just a shame he applied to be a diversity and inclusion manager.

    5. spacecrustaceans on

      Arguably, they didn’t carry out proper due diligence. It’s not exactly difficult these days for employers to check someone’s employment history with HMRC. It’s pretty standard as part of pre-employment checks. It also raises the question of why a basic or enhanced DBS check wasn’t carried out. While what the individual did was obviously wrong, the hospital also seems to have dropped the ball by not completing its own basic checks. They could have avoided this entire situation if they themselves had taken reasonable steps to verify his background before employing him.

    6. CronusCronusCronus on

      amateur. Everyone knows that if you’re going to fabricate your CV you don’t do it with the public sector. They be sleeping HMRC.

    7. The_Grizzly_Bear on

      Applied in June 2018, started in January 2019. Typical NHS recruitment…

    8. Catman9lives on

      11k for six months work? Who did they think was going to apply anyway?

    Leave A Reply