> Rockstar North said it was incorrect to suggest the dismissals were linked to union membership or activities. It said it took action after staff discussed confidential information, including specific game features from upcoming titles, in a public forum.
You get some right shits in an office, sounds like they were on their way and this unionising was an attempt to save their own bacon.
JoeyJoJoeJr_Shabadoo on
If what Rockstar say is true, and that it had nothing to do with union-busting, then surely they would have a strong defamation case
BowiesFixedPupil on
I’m sure they’ll give a massive shit that I won’t buy any of their products, but there’s not much else I can do.
Ironrats on
If this is true, it seems they violated NDA agreements, with some sense, Rockstar kept the proof.
NoEstate1459 on
Long out the court case, fine them for a % of revenue based on their revenue the year they GTA VI comes out
5 commenti
> Rockstar North said it was incorrect to suggest the dismissals were linked to union membership or activities. It said it took action after staff discussed confidential information, including specific game features from upcoming titles, in a public forum.
You get some right shits in an office, sounds like they were on their way and this unionising was an attempt to save their own bacon.
If what Rockstar say is true, and that it had nothing to do with union-busting, then surely they would have a strong defamation case
I’m sure they’ll give a massive shit that I won’t buy any of their products, but there’s not much else I can do.
If this is true, it seems they violated NDA agreements, with some sense, Rockstar kept the proof.
Long out the court case, fine them for a % of revenue based on their revenue the year they GTA VI comes out