I’m here for the public transport safety authority
Callme-Sal on
Surprise u-turns are not very safe.
Gold-Vacation-169 on
So they won’t get rid of the useless rsa and they won’t complete lowering urban speed limits to 30km.
Its like they are happy with people being killed
Bill_Badbody on
The lads up in portwest will be breathing a giant sigh if relief.
The money will keep flowing for years to come.
Jellyfish00001111 on
By not removing them, they are encouraging the civil service culture of no consequences.
wc08amg on
Most useless quango in the history of the state.
FearGaeilge on
>At the time, Lawless said it was a “binding” decision that was being made because the operational side of the RSA (which is responsible for driving tests and coordinating the NCT) was “not working” and because the organisation’s safety promotion remit was “also not where it needs to be”.
>
>The plan was to split the authority into two, with one new agency responsible for services and the other for road safety.
>
>It came following an independent external review of the RSA, which recommended the split.
1) Seems like wasted money if you’re going to ignore the results of a review you paid for.
2) Interesting to see how binding something “binding” is when the government don’t want to do it.
stormwave6 on
This actually a good thing as hopefully the money thay would have been wasted rebranding everything and moving offices can be spent on hiring more testers.
9 commenti
I hate the RSA
I’m here for the public transport safety authority
Surprise u-turns are not very safe.
So they won’t get rid of the useless rsa and they won’t complete lowering urban speed limits to 30km.
Its like they are happy with people being killed
The lads up in portwest will be breathing a giant sigh if relief.
The money will keep flowing for years to come.
By not removing them, they are encouraging the civil service culture of no consequences.
Most useless quango in the history of the state.
>At the time, Lawless said it was a “binding” decision that was being made because the operational side of the RSA (which is responsible for driving tests and coordinating the NCT) was “not working” and because the organisation’s safety promotion remit was “also not where it needs to be”.
>
>The plan was to split the authority into two, with one new agency responsible for services and the other for road safety.
>
>It came following an independent external review of the RSA, which recommended the split.
1) Seems like wasted money if you’re going to ignore the results of a review you paid for.
2) Interesting to see how binding something “binding” is when the government don’t want to do it.
This actually a good thing as hopefully the money thay would have been wasted rebranding everything and moving offices can be spent on hiring more testers.