Major step for France a new nuclear carrier shows long-term commitment to naval power and strategic reach.
Spooknik on
Go France
VigorousElk on
Interesting choice. Big warships spend a lot of time in port being maintained, repaired or upgraded (mid-life upgrades can take years).
France decided to go for one big (albeit nowhere near close to the US and Chinese super-carriers), nuclear carrier as opposed to the UK going with two medium-sized (albeit only slightly smaller) conventionally powered ones. As a result the French carrier’s range is close to infinite (limited only by other supplies carried like perishables and aviation fuel for its airwing), but there is only one single ship.
If a crisis develops in the Falklands or anywhere around the world and *Queen Elizabeth* is under maintenance, the UK can send *Prince of Wales*. If a crisis unfolds in French Guyana or New Caledonia and the French carrier is in port for upgrades or nuclear refuelling, tough luck. No ship available.
Seems a little short-sighted honestly.
JoSeSc on
Do we know if they are just building one or more?
Any-Original-6113 on
Apparently, France has no doubt that it can carry out the FCAS program on its own.
Palestine_Achtung on
Is this going to be powered by Russian uranium like their power stations?
kritisha462 on
France is doubling down on independent strategic power projection.
IntrepidWolverine517 on
“Propulsion will be provided by two new K22 nuclear reactors, each generating roughly 220 megawatts of electrical power”
This is not correct. The 220 MW relate to thermal power, not electrical. Overall this will result in 110 MW for propulsion.
awoo2 on
French aviators were trainedqualified on US ships during the French aircraft carriers refitt in 2017-18, the French don’t want to rely on the American next time.
Aldemar_DE on
They are basically broke. I am sure in this situation a new carrier does not help.
tree_boom on
Nothing that wasn’t already known if course, but it’s great that the project is going ahead, the French carrier is an extremely valuable capability, particularly given the strike potential of its air wing.
Fandango_Jones on
Funding will be an interesting endeavor with the current budget crisis.
LeandrysRx on
Bold move from my country at the age of drone saturation and hypersonic missiles, especially when our country is so vulnerable when it comes to land forces, military drone’s manufacturing capacity (almost 0) and nonexistent AA defenses, but hey, let’s build something which can be wiped out in minutes after the beginning of a war, sounds like a priority.
Technical-Art4989 on
Electromagnetic catapult from who?
TheoryOfDevolution on
We already know this. The question is if they’d order a second one or not. My money is on not.
16 commenti
‘Two is one, one is none’.
Major step for France a new nuclear carrier shows long-term commitment to naval power and strategic reach.
Go France
Interesting choice. Big warships spend a lot of time in port being maintained, repaired or upgraded (mid-life upgrades can take years).
France decided to go for one big (albeit nowhere near close to the US and Chinese super-carriers), nuclear carrier as opposed to the UK going with two medium-sized (albeit only slightly smaller) conventionally powered ones. As a result the French carrier’s range is close to infinite (limited only by other supplies carried like perishables and aviation fuel for its airwing), but there is only one single ship.
If a crisis develops in the Falklands or anywhere around the world and *Queen Elizabeth* is under maintenance, the UK can send *Prince of Wales*. If a crisis unfolds in French Guyana or New Caledonia and the French carrier is in port for upgrades or nuclear refuelling, tough luck. No ship available.
Seems a little short-sighted honestly.
Do we know if they are just building one or more?
Apparently, France has no doubt that it can carry out the FCAS program on its own.
Is this going to be powered by Russian uranium like their power stations?
France is doubling down on independent strategic power projection.
“Propulsion will be provided by two new K22 nuclear reactors, each generating roughly 220 megawatts of electrical power”
This is not correct. The 220 MW relate to thermal power, not electrical. Overall this will result in 110 MW for propulsion.
French aviators were trainedqualified on US ships during the French aircraft carriers refitt in 2017-18, the French don’t want to rely on the American next time.
They are basically broke. I am sure in this situation a new carrier does not help.
Nothing that wasn’t already known if course, but it’s great that the project is going ahead, the French carrier is an extremely valuable capability, particularly given the strike potential of its air wing.
Funding will be an interesting endeavor with the current budget crisis.
Bold move from my country at the age of drone saturation and hypersonic missiles, especially when our country is so vulnerable when it comes to land forces, military drone’s manufacturing capacity (almost 0) and nonexistent AA defenses, but hey, let’s build something which can be wiped out in minutes after the beginning of a war, sounds like a priority.
Electromagnetic catapult from who?
We already know this. The question is if they’d order a second one or not. My money is on not.