>Drug pricing has emerged as one of the biggest issues for pharmaceutical companies this year, as the U.S. looks to dramatically reduce the costs paid by consumers.
>As the largest single market for most pharma and biotech firms, higher drug prices in the U.S. — often nearly three times as costly as in other countries — are a key factor in the industry’s reliance on American sales, with branded drugs commanding even steeper premiums.
>President Donald Trump has pushed for lower drug prices for Americans through so-called Most Favored Nations drug pricing, whereby the prices in the U.S. are set at the lowest price paid by other wealthy countries. That could have a tremendous impact on companies’ balance sheets.
>But exactly how exposed are Europe’s biggest pharma companies to the U.S. market?
>**Majority U.S. sales**
>Among the 10 largest biopharmaceutical companies in the Stoxx 600 health index, five have a majority of their total sales from the U.S.: Roche, Novo Nordisk, GSK, Argenx, and UCB.
>Argenx is the most exposed, with 85% of total sales originating in the U.S. in its last reported period.
>The least exposed are Germany’s Merck KGaA and Bayer, with about 30% of sales coming from the U.S. Both Merck and Bayer have diversified businesses that go beyond pharmaceuticals while Roche also has a sizeable diagnostics division.
>Meanwhile, AstraZeneca, the FTSE 100′s largest company, generates 42% of its sales from the U.S., and is aiming to boost this share as it targets $80 billion in revenue by 2030. In its third-quarter earnings report, the company, which has a broad portfolio of blockbuster drugs comprising cancer, respiratory, and diabetes medicines, said it is delivering on its strategy to strengthen operations in the U.S. to “power growth.”
>The Cambridge, U.K.-based company has also pledged significant investments in the U.S., just like peers Novartis, Roche, and GSK, since Trump took up his second presidential term.
>**Making deals**
>Trump’s push for slashing drug prices has led many firms on both sides of the Atlantic to make deals with the administration.
>In May this year, the president signed an executive order establishing MFN drug pricing. He has also sent letters to 17 major drugmakers, calling for them to slash U.S. prescription prices to levels paid overseas.
>At the same time, Trump has made a push for onshoring production of various goods, including pharmaceuticals, and threatened triple-digit tariffs for drugmakers that fail to invest in U.S. manufacturing — further ramping up the pressure on companies to make deals with his administration.
>AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and other U.S. pharma giants have already made deals with Trump to lower prices of their medicines in the country, although analysts say it may not have a significant impact on their bottom lines due to the way the deals were structured.
>″[AstraZeneca’s] MFN deal is more benign than appreciated, but EU countries may see access to drugs reduced,” said Jefferies analysts in November.
>Late Wednesday, Bloomberg reported that heavyweights Roche and Novartis – the two biggest European pharma companies by market value – were closing in on drug pricing deals with the Trump administration, which may be announced as soon as Friday.
>Both companies told CNBC they supported the administration’s goal of lowering drug costs for Americans but declined to confirm an imminent deal. Novartis said it was “in discussion with the Administration.”
LakLuk-555 on
Well, it’s because they sell stuff at 10 times the price compared to the European market. So turnover and margin are quite high for the US market compared to the rest.
Much more than tariffs, should US become a country whose welfare is more decent, it probably would hit that turnover in a much stronger way.
VigorousElk on
‘Exposed’ is a weird choice of term. The US is the world’s biggest economy, the size of the entire EU combined, and a highly privatised ultra-capitalist healthcare market that allows for massive profit margins at the expense of patients.
Of course every European healthcare company is heavily invested there, it’s a gold mine.
koensch57 on
And the US is exposed to European Big Pharma.
If EU firms do not want their products used for executions, US is heavily exposed
Any-Original-6113 on
Judging by the charts and tables, without the American market, Europe’s pharmaceutical industry would go bankrupt.
Perhaps it’s time to diversify with all our might, rather than swallowing the bait of the American market hook, line, and sinker.
Otherwise, the bankruptcy could be sudden and happen overnight.
FayeTwin on
Europes price control vs Americas market power, this gap was always going to be tested
2B-Pencil on
Breaking news: globalized economies are heavily dependent on each other.
Haunting-Detail2025 on
“Country with the largest and wealthiest economy on planet earth that allows for massive profits for pharmaceutical and medical companies is where pharmaceutical and medical companies get a lot of their money from”
PreWiBa on
I mean, America is just a gigantic economy which really lets big pharma do what it wants, with a very unhealthy population.
Americans are somewhat correct when they say that they fund the world’s pharmaceutical research, because most of the revenue IS there.
However, it’s not the flex Americans think it is, but just another testament to how rigged and corrupt their system has become.
The US system is really hard on not allowing insurance companies and hospitals to appear as one side during negotiations with pharmaceutical companies, hence their negotiating power is much, much smaller compared to countries where universal healthcare systems are able to strike much better deals.
Aggressive-Cut5836 on
If the average price for life saving drugs in the US was made equal to their prices in Switzerland, a country where the average person is even wealthier than the average American, the entire pharmaceutical industry would go bankrupt. Eventually either Europeans will need to pay more or there will simply be fewer companies and people employed in the pharma industry, not to mention lower salaries.
OwlSlow1356 on
bla bla blaaaaaaa blaaaaaa the times when the US was always doomed to fall on their feet is at the end of the road. scamming it will not make it a different outcome this time!
Sniffwee_Gloomshine on
So the US is basically dependent on European medication? Where I come from you call that leverage.
MrDabb on
So Americans are subsidizing healthcare in Europe?
Psephological on
Does also mean it’s another lever against the US. Works both ways.
14 commenti
>Drug pricing has emerged as one of the biggest issues for pharmaceutical companies this year, as the U.S. looks to dramatically reduce the costs paid by consumers.
>As the largest single market for most pharma and biotech firms, higher drug prices in the U.S. — often nearly three times as costly as in other countries — are a key factor in the industry’s reliance on American sales, with branded drugs commanding even steeper premiums.
>President Donald Trump has pushed for lower drug prices for Americans through so-called Most Favored Nations drug pricing, whereby the prices in the U.S. are set at the lowest price paid by other wealthy countries. That could have a tremendous impact on companies’ balance sheets.
>But exactly how exposed are Europe’s biggest pharma companies to the U.S. market?
>**Majority U.S. sales**
>Among the 10 largest biopharmaceutical companies in the Stoxx 600 health index, five have a majority of their total sales from the U.S.: Roche, Novo Nordisk, GSK, Argenx, and UCB.
>Argenx is the most exposed, with 85% of total sales originating in the U.S. in its last reported period.
>The least exposed are Germany’s Merck KGaA and Bayer, with about 30% of sales coming from the U.S. Both Merck and Bayer have diversified businesses that go beyond pharmaceuticals while Roche also has a sizeable diagnostics division.
>Meanwhile, AstraZeneca, the FTSE 100′s largest company, generates 42% of its sales from the U.S., and is aiming to boost this share as it targets $80 billion in revenue by 2030. In its third-quarter earnings report, the company, which has a broad portfolio of blockbuster drugs comprising cancer, respiratory, and diabetes medicines, said it is delivering on its strategy to strengthen operations in the U.S. to “power growth.”
>The Cambridge, U.K.-based company has also pledged significant investments in the U.S., just like peers Novartis, Roche, and GSK, since Trump took up his second presidential term.
>**Making deals**
>Trump’s push for slashing drug prices has led many firms on both sides of the Atlantic to make deals with the administration.
>In May this year, the president signed an executive order establishing MFN drug pricing. He has also sent letters to 17 major drugmakers, calling for them to slash U.S. prescription prices to levels paid overseas.
>At the same time, Trump has made a push for onshoring production of various goods, including pharmaceuticals, and threatened triple-digit tariffs for drugmakers that fail to invest in U.S. manufacturing — further ramping up the pressure on companies to make deals with his administration.
>AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and other U.S. pharma giants have already made deals with Trump to lower prices of their medicines in the country, although analysts say it may not have a significant impact on their bottom lines due to the way the deals were structured.
>″[AstraZeneca’s] MFN deal is more benign than appreciated, but EU countries may see access to drugs reduced,” said Jefferies analysts in November.
>Late Wednesday, Bloomberg reported that heavyweights Roche and Novartis – the two biggest European pharma companies by market value – were closing in on drug pricing deals with the Trump administration, which may be announced as soon as Friday.
>Both companies told CNBC they supported the administration’s goal of lowering drug costs for Americans but declined to confirm an imminent deal. Novartis said it was “in discussion with the Administration.”
Well, it’s because they sell stuff at 10 times the price compared to the European market. So turnover and margin are quite high for the US market compared to the rest.
Much more than tariffs, should US become a country whose welfare is more decent, it probably would hit that turnover in a much stronger way.
‘Exposed’ is a weird choice of term. The US is the world’s biggest economy, the size of the entire EU combined, and a highly privatised ultra-capitalist healthcare market that allows for massive profit margins at the expense of patients.
Of course every European healthcare company is heavily invested there, it’s a gold mine.
And the US is exposed to European Big Pharma.
If EU firms do not want their products used for executions, US is heavily exposed
Judging by the charts and tables, without the American market, Europe’s pharmaceutical industry would go bankrupt.
Perhaps it’s time to diversify with all our might, rather than swallowing the bait of the American market hook, line, and sinker.
Otherwise, the bankruptcy could be sudden and happen overnight.
Europes price control vs Americas market power, this gap was always going to be tested
Breaking news: globalized economies are heavily dependent on each other.
“Country with the largest and wealthiest economy on planet earth that allows for massive profits for pharmaceutical and medical companies is where pharmaceutical and medical companies get a lot of their money from”
I mean, America is just a gigantic economy which really lets big pharma do what it wants, with a very unhealthy population.
Americans are somewhat correct when they say that they fund the world’s pharmaceutical research, because most of the revenue IS there.
However, it’s not the flex Americans think it is, but just another testament to how rigged and corrupt their system has become.
The US system is really hard on not allowing insurance companies and hospitals to appear as one side during negotiations with pharmaceutical companies, hence their negotiating power is much, much smaller compared to countries where universal healthcare systems are able to strike much better deals.
If the average price for life saving drugs in the US was made equal to their prices in Switzerland, a country where the average person is even wealthier than the average American, the entire pharmaceutical industry would go bankrupt. Eventually either Europeans will need to pay more or there will simply be fewer companies and people employed in the pharma industry, not to mention lower salaries.
bla bla blaaaaaaa blaaaaaa the times when the US was always doomed to fall on their feet is at the end of the road. scamming it will not make it a different outcome this time!
So the US is basically dependent on European medication? Where I come from you call that leverage.
So Americans are subsidizing healthcare in Europe?
Does also mean it’s another lever against the US. Works both ways.