Tag
Austria
Belgio
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cechia
Croatia
Croazia
Czech
Czechia
Czech Republic
Danimarca
Denmark
Estonia
Europa
Europe
France
Francia
Germania
Germany
Grecia
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Irlanda
Polonia
Polska
Portogallo
Portugal
Regno Unito
Repubblica Ceca
Repubblica di Turchia
Romania
Serbia
Slovacchia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Svezia
Sweden
Turchia
Turkey
Ucraina
Ucraino
Ukraine
Ungheria
United Kingdom
23 commenti
I wonder how many times we’re going to have to hear “Labour tried to ban X because of da freeze peach”
“Starmer says he’s been told X now complying with UK law over Grok deepfakes”
Translation: Starmer has been by the US that UK politicans will face sanctions and travel ban if they dare to act on X.
>
>If Starmer is successful in banning X in Britain, I will move forward with legislation that is currently being drafted to sanction not only Starmer, but Britain as a whole. This would mirror actions previously taken by the United States in response to foreign governments restricting the platform, including the dispute with Brazil in 2024–2025, which resulted in tariffs, visa revocations, and sanctions and consequences tied to free speech concerns against Brazilian officials over concerns related to censorship and free-speech violations. Starmer should reconsider this course of action, or there will be consequences.
>There are always technical bugs during the early phases of new technology, especially AI, and those issues are typically addressed quickly. X treats these matters seriously and acts promptly. Let’s be clear: this is not about technical compliance. This is a political war against e[lonmusk](https://x.com/elonmusk) and free speech—nothing more.
[https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2009460496668426449?s=20](https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2009460496668426449?s=20)
Should be easy enough to test if this is true. For the police that is. I certainly don’t recommend anyone else try it.
So he’s explicitly saying they *were not* complying with the law before? Previously he’d said it was all OFCOM, interesting that he’s said they weren’t, when are the prosecutions?
This is a very poorly written headline and in fact has already been changed slightly on the BBC.
> The Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he has been informed that Elon Musk’s X is “acting to ensure full compliance with UK law” over sexualised deepfakes produced by its AI tool, Grok.
So he’s saying he’s been told they are working towards compliance. So no u-turn on his part, no sudden change on their part either, but a “wait and see”.
I’m sure this won’t stop people teeing off in an entirely partisan way here but I thought people might at least want to know what’s in the article.
Some people use X.
Those people are cunts.
That should be the government position.
I’m sure someone *told* him that.
Now can we have the truth?
Amazing how quickly America got in line when their money was at risk
So it’s worked
Literally this has gone perfectly, I can’t wait for people to still find a way to moan though
He threatened that if X didnt comply with the law they’d be banned, and X backed down, thus they’re not breaking the law, so no reason to ban them now
Still fine them, and allow people with non consensual deep fakes to sue the creator and x for sharing them.
Alright Starmer, I hope you don’t trust their word for it genuinely and you are just trying to be diplomatic to save face.
right wingers are still going to be mad as by free speech they meant their ability to generate child porn
Bbbbbbbbut government’s don’t always tell the truth, and what about free speech? /S
Low quality headline, he’s been told now such thing. What he was told is that Grok is working on it.
The threat of a ban has made them wet their pants. What would they do without their propaganda tube?
Turns out Great Britain can enforce our own laws. Right wingers must be in tatters.
Break the law
Promise you are now complying
Ok, no worries…..
Why have all the news articles about this stopped mentioning that it’s being used to generate CSAM? it makes me suspicious that influence is being exerted to spin the story in the least damaging way possible.
As of 1 hour ago it seems it’s still creating any lewd photo requested. So not sure how it’s compliant. (No I didn’t do it just saw a request that was fulfilled an hour ago)
[ Removed by Reddit ]
So it looks like Twitter were actually worried – even an ineffectual ban would absolutely tank ad revenue – hit them in the money
Whose word is he taking for it? Has he seen proof? What a useless pm.
He should test it himself and share his new bikini photo.
I thought Musk would make X unavailable rather than capitulate to the “Stalinists”.
I was wrong.
Imgur on the other hand…