A project dead on arrival, who wants to use american tech in these times
ThisTheRealLife on
Still owned by AWS and so still subject to the patriot act.
Natural_Read9357 on
Kinda late!
No_Donkey456 on
There’s definitely a need there but I don’t think an American company can fill it.
swirve-psn on
Still American controlled.
There is nothing stopping Trump from forcing AWS to handover European data. Laws only matter to those held to them.
feichinger on
“sovereign”, lol. That isn’t how it works, Amazon.
dpwtr on
The fact they feel the need to actually try and mitigate concerns reaffirms European leverage on this issue. Can’t wait for the isolationist crowd to feel the hurt to their precious companies and the subsequent knock on effects to their economy which they seem to take for granted.
zdzislav_kozibroda on
Trump: “Hey AWS. Give us all the data we want or you get 50% tax”
Amazon immediately folds. Case closed.
IntriguinglyRandom on
Get fucked Amazon! This isn’t about “ethics” it’s just a gambit to add or maintain profit control.
GrenobleLyon on
Hetzner
Scaleway
infomaniak
PrettyFlyForALawGuy on
Still American controlled. Worth less than zero in terms of digital sovereignty.
t0xic_sh0t on
Who pays for an expensive Trojan horse?
PS: Tel Aviv is no Europe.
youderkB on
Worthless as long as the parent company remains under US jurisdiction. They will then continue to be forced to hand over data upon request and NOT inform those affected.
MootRevolution on
There’s nothing Sovereign about this cloud solution if it’s owned by an American company. They will still be legal obliged to share all the data with the US government and it’s agencies.
mindthegoat_redux on
Narrator: They didn’t address data sovereignty concerns.
Dimension874 on
Too little too late
AnAussiebum on
We need an EU funded and owned alternative to AWS.
OrganicWPillowLeft on
It is national security matter now, having government core services under foreign control is kamikaze behavior
Spinoza42 on
They’re rushing this out the door with no Cloudfront and no Identity Center, and no plans for a second region. AWS knows if they don’t release it right now they might as well scrap it immediately. I think they’re too late: autumn 2025 a lot of organisations would have jumped at the chance, now if you’re going to migrate, might as well move to European owned. A different AWS partition with less functionality is still a painful migration, better make it still a bit more painful for a more fundamental sovereignty.
Coconut681 on
We need a European alternative to azure, aws, etc for cloud services.
yellowbai on
A fig leaf. The Trump administration won’t care about European sovereignty or law.
kowlown on
Bullshit. It’s a US company, under the rule of the US “legal” system.
Nothing can block any US government to strong-arm this company to hand over the data it has.
They can also do economic espionage under the guise of corruption investigation.
Gaeus_ on
OVH : exist
Every European leader : yeah but there was theses fire incidents.
Swimming-Use1490 on
Or, even better, stop using AWS and stop making the problem worse.
25 commenti
Fuck AWS. We also should get a European Reddit.
A project dead on arrival, who wants to use american tech in these times
Still owned by AWS and so still subject to the patriot act.
Kinda late!
There’s definitely a need there but I don’t think an American company can fill it.
Still American controlled.
There is nothing stopping Trump from forcing AWS to handover European data. Laws only matter to those held to them.
“sovereign”, lol. That isn’t how it works, Amazon.
The fact they feel the need to actually try and mitigate concerns reaffirms European leverage on this issue. Can’t wait for the isolationist crowd to feel the hurt to their precious companies and the subsequent knock on effects to their economy which they seem to take for granted.
Trump: “Hey AWS. Give us all the data we want or you get 50% tax”
Amazon immediately folds. Case closed.
Get fucked Amazon! This isn’t about “ethics” it’s just a gambit to add or maintain profit control.
Hetzner
Scaleway
infomaniak
Still American controlled. Worth less than zero in terms of digital sovereignty.
Who pays for an expensive Trojan horse?
PS: Tel Aviv is no Europe.
Worthless as long as the parent company remains under US jurisdiction. They will then continue to be forced to hand over data upon request and NOT inform those affected.
There’s nothing Sovereign about this cloud solution if it’s owned by an American company. They will still be legal obliged to share all the data with the US government and it’s agencies.
Narrator: They didn’t address data sovereignty concerns.
Too little too late
We need an EU funded and owned alternative to AWS.
It is national security matter now, having government core services under foreign control is kamikaze behavior
They’re rushing this out the door with no Cloudfront and no Identity Center, and no plans for a second region. AWS knows if they don’t release it right now they might as well scrap it immediately. I think they’re too late: autumn 2025 a lot of organisations would have jumped at the chance, now if you’re going to migrate, might as well move to European owned. A different AWS partition with less functionality is still a painful migration, better make it still a bit more painful for a more fundamental sovereignty.
We need a European alternative to azure, aws, etc for cloud services.
A fig leaf. The Trump administration won’t care about European sovereignty or law.
Bullshit. It’s a US company, under the rule of the US “legal” system.
Nothing can block any US government to strong-arm this company to hand over the data it has.
They can also do economic espionage under the guise of corruption investigation.
OVH : exist
Every European leader : yeah but there was theses fire incidents.
Or, even better, stop using AWS and stop making the problem worse.