Share.

    5 commenti

    1. ClockworkOrdinator on

      Wasn’t Crowder outed as being literally paid by russia today to spread missinformation?

    2. The argument is: We can give Americans the same benefits instead of footing the NATO bill. 

      This is fine. The US should pay way less. Trust is broken so there’s no point in having Uncle Sam pay for it, right?

    3. Wintermute841 on

      No Steven, Greenland is “on the table” because your current POTUS is a greedy chap who doesn’t respect previous international commitments, has a hard time understanding the word “no” and apparently doesn’t mind a quick land/resource grab or two.

      That’s why Greenland is “on the table” Steven.

      Also free public universities are a thing in many other countries, Poland included, so that’s a pretty low bar to make the list.

    4. samuraiSatan on

      It’s so much bullshit with that 2/3 NATO defensive costs.
      Also: how could you guys have any work-life balance? American billionaires must have more money and you guys make it harder for them!

      Fuck USA. Third world bullshit feudal country with nukes. Dumbest place ever that’s is being run by a clown and where its citizens are fed chemicals all their life to make them stupid and vote for billionaire class that enslaves them more. Dipshit country

    5. firstmoonbunny on

      ah yes of course the US would take the money they pay into NATO and use it to fund free education for its population, and not, idk go to war somewhere they don’t belong… right???

    Leave A Reply