On the one hand, someone is rightly challenging what the overall impact is.
On the other hand, bureaucratic Britain strikes again: all major projects must have at least a 3 year delay while legal challenges take place, making the country less attractive to investment, and projects costing 5 times as much as they should.
MordauntSnagge on
Why would anyone invest if you can just be challenged on the “amount” of energy that is used where the metric is “the impact on climate change”? Every energy source has an impact. This is just enabling economic suicide.
2 commenti
Mixed bag on this one.
On the one hand, someone is rightly challenging what the overall impact is.
On the other hand, bureaucratic Britain strikes again: all major projects must have at least a 3 year delay while legal challenges take place, making the country less attractive to investment, and projects costing 5 times as much as they should.
Why would anyone invest if you can just be challenged on the “amount” of energy that is used where the metric is “the impact on climate change”? Every energy source has an impact. This is just enabling economic suicide.