For Sweden to make some? For political commitments to be covered by the French and British weapons? Or something like nuclear sharing? Bit unclear there. I think the article implies the latter most strongly, but I’m not certain
GanacheCharacter2104 on
This is great, nordics definitely need a nuclear deterrent we can rely on.
Any-Original-6113 on
I believe this is a completely normal discussion.
The United States has begun demanding too much in exchange for security guarantees under its nuclear umbrella—up to and including territorial concessions and economic preferences.
Why shouldn’t Europe have an alternative, European option?
This isn’t about deploying nuclear weapons on Swedish soil, but reading between the lines, Sweden appears willing to prepare the infrastructure to host non-American nuclear weapons and possibly contribute financially to developing new—and upgrading existing—French and British nuclear arsenals.
3 commenti
For Sweden to make some? For political commitments to be covered by the French and British weapons? Or something like nuclear sharing? Bit unclear there. I think the article implies the latter most strongly, but I’m not certain
This is great, nordics definitely need a nuclear deterrent we can rely on.
I believe this is a completely normal discussion.
The United States has begun demanding too much in exchange for security guarantees under its nuclear umbrella—up to and including territorial concessions and economic preferences.
Why shouldn’t Europe have an alternative, European option?
This isn’t about deploying nuclear weapons on Swedish soil, but reading between the lines, Sweden appears willing to prepare the infrastructure to host non-American nuclear weapons and possibly contribute financially to developing new—and upgrading existing—French and British nuclear arsenals.