Share.

13 commenti

  1. It was Ms Higgins’s evidence that Mr Coleman told her to move so he could park his van. She said she could not do so, as she was waiting for her husband.

    Ms Higgins said the van hit her left knee, causing her leg to buckle slightly, although she was not knocked to the ground. Ms Higgins said her husband saw the collision.

  2. Danoks0506 on

    Poor van driver, i would put her and the judge in the joint

  3. Sufficient_Shift_370 on

    Open season. Minor foot injury which didn’t even result in falling over, 170k wtf

  4. Holding a space for her husband. The fucking entitlement of that woman! If she wasn’t so entitled, this wouldn’t have happened. At all. I don’t think I’d have struck her but I can very easily visualise the headloss. What about the damage her actions have caused the mental health of that man?

  5. elfy4eva on

    Landlord scum. I hope that gets appealed, reads like utter fraud.

  6. SteveK27982 on

    Disgraceful, if you’re not in a vehicle you can’t occupy or hold a parking space and shouldn’t be standing on the road. Awards like this just encourage and reward stupid behaviour

  7. zeegowler on

    Park across the space and wait in future play the waiting game

  8. Expert-Thing7728 on

    Very disappointing to see this kind of behaviour from the owner of ‘a substantial property portfolio’. This kind of money-grubbing behaviour could really tarnish their image.

  9. SouthSource1936 on

    Don’t know how she survived to be honest. A knock to the knee can be catastrophic /s

  10. Tadomeku on

    Jesus Christ that is so aggravating.

    The judge admitted that the van _probably_ hit her.

    The judge said her claims for lossed earnings was completely exaggerated and reflected badly on the claimant yet _still_ awarded her 60k earnings.

    Reading between the lines there was basically zero medical evidence of any collision.

    Fucking hell.

  11. Sudden_Mud_509 on

    The judicial system in this country is an absolute joke !!!

Leave A Reply