Technically the truth? They don’t convict for having the mental illness, just for acts. Still a weird thing to say.
grafknives on
pedophilia is not a crime.
and polanski was not convicted. At all. He fled country before that.
secondpersonsingular on
Like most Sikorski quotes, factually correct yet clearly aimed at stoking moral outrage.
Sikorski just loves to ragebait.
Roquet_ on
“He was not convicted of murder, but of bludgeoning another man to death”
Sea-Manufacturer3797 on
Pewnie są kolegami i stąd ta próba wybielania. Nie powinno być jakiejkolwiek zgody na tłumaczenie takich haniebnych czynów.
Effective_Author_315 on
Rozróżnienie bez różnicy. Podwójne standardy były stosowane wobec Polańskiego przez zbyt długi czas.
Auspectress on
Technically true. From a medical standpoint, pedophilia refers to an attraction to prepubescent children (usually under the age of 11). From a legal perspective, you aren’t convicted of ‘pedophilia’ itself, but of an act – statutory rape or sexual contact with a minor. Likewise, the majority of people with pedophilic interest are not criminals and require psychological and psychiatric care.
But yeah, Twitter isn’t exactly the best place to post things like that, especially outside of professional discussions.
Similar-Cat-9767 on
Senior-Preference195 on
Well, it’s obvious that a joo will defend another joo. In Ta*mud it says that a man can have xxx with a girl when of 3 years and 1 day old (if hymen was broken by a stick by accident then she can be even 1 day old) and a woman can have xxx with a boy of 9 years and 1 day old and Tel Aviv is a safe heaven for pdf files. So yeah, it’s totally legal for them, everything is 🤡
16 commenti
https://preview.redd.it/vt3d8yz6bqhg1.jpeg?width=1178&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c947e0568c3dd2554a8f684cee2318dfc34852e0
Technically the truth? They don’t convict for having the mental illness, just for acts. Still a weird thing to say.
pedophilia is not a crime.
and polanski was not convicted. At all. He fled country before that.
Like most Sikorski quotes, factually correct yet clearly aimed at stoking moral outrage.
Sikorski just loves to ragebait.
“He was not convicted of murder, but of bludgeoning another man to death”
Pewnie są kolegami i stąd ta próba wybielania. Nie powinno być jakiejkolwiek zgody na tłumaczenie takich haniebnych czynów.
Rozróżnienie bez różnicy. Podwójne standardy były stosowane wobec Polańskiego przez zbyt długi czas.
Technically true. From a medical standpoint, pedophilia refers to an attraction to prepubescent children (usually under the age of 11). From a legal perspective, you aren’t convicted of ‘pedophilia’ itself, but of an act – statutory rape or sexual contact with a minor. Likewise, the majority of people with pedophilic interest are not criminals and require psychological and psychiatric care.
But yeah, Twitter isn’t exactly the best place to post things like that, especially outside of professional discussions.
Well, it’s obvious that a joo will defend another joo. In Ta*mud it says that a man can have xxx with a girl when of 3 years and 1 day old (if hymen was broken by a stick by accident then she can be even 1 day old) and a woman can have xxx with a boy of 9 years and 1 day old and Tel Aviv is a safe heaven for pdf files. So yeah, it’s totally legal for them, everything is 🤡
PANIE RADOSŁAWIE NIEEEEE
MISTER JOYFAME NOOOOO
https://preview.redd.it/futc7whohqhg1.jpeg?width=1025&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8579c7fded647e91e937e7e3e0ae02ea1fe56cbc
I think he thought miner like a coal miner
Prawda
You gotta understand him, Polanski’s very small and children are small, too
Why are these guys deleting tweets/posts? They are plastered all over the net ten seconds after going live.