Starmer ha “piena fiducia” in Morgan McSweeney, dice il numero 10 tra le richieste di licenziamento

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2026/feb/05/peter-mandelson-keir-starmer-jeffrey-epstein-labour-updates-latest-news?page=with%3Ablock-6984b0d48f08f529bdb85e50#block-6984b0d48f08f529bdb85e50

di LauraPhilps7654

Share.

42 commenti

  1. ModeReasonable580 on

    Dumb fucking decision. Holding onto McSweeney will be his downfall, the only thing that could save Starmer right now is scapegoating him.

  2. PracticeNo8733 on

    I bet senior government figures have nightmares about Starmer having “full confidence” in them.

  3. Formal_Produce3759 on

    Lol, imagine wrecking your own political career for an adviser.

  4. Krabsandwich on

    Well of course he has if he sacks Mc Sweeny he will be next in line for the chop. Mc Sweeny stays as long as Starmer does otherwise those calling for Mc Sweeny’s head will just move on to Starmer.

  5. YouHaveAWomansMouth on

    Despite how independent and strong-willed he might seem, Emu can’t sack Rod Hull.

  6. Surely someone has montaged a “full confidence” kiss of death from leaders to someone about to be sacked or “resigns”.

    eg

    >Mr Sunak has expressed “[full confidence](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/gavin-williamson-resignation-text-messages-who-b2221198.html?)” in Sir Gavin despite describing the messages he sent to Ms Morton as “unacceptable”.

    >Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said Sir Gavin was “clearly not suitable” for his job in the Cabinet Office, calling his appointment a sign of how “weak” Mr Sunak is.

  7. Acceptable_Foot3370 on

    Starmer is amazingly inept, he seems confused, is always changing his mind, Labour Party must remove him as soon as possible

  8. BuckfastEnjoyer on

    Just made a noise similair to parliament yesterday. I’m actually in shock that he’s going to try and hang on here.

  9. NoTitleChamp on

    Christ what dirt does he have? The continued attempts to protect him is amazing.

  10. sucksblueeggs on

    What a fucking idiot. Trouble is, who do you replace him with? They are all inept. At least Starmer had some experience in high level positions in the past.

  11. Necessary-Product361 on

    Starmer saying he has full confidence in someone is a kiss of death

  12. philipwhiuk on

    The statement of full confidence almost always immediately precedes a sacking based on some new fairly minor bit of info.

  13. FlowerGathering on

    Kier can’t remove him since MC sweeny ousted Corbyn through his think tank got him in power and formed the faction that’s running the government Zac Polanski has a good interview on it on his YouTube channel.

  14. Pen_dragons_pizza on

    Fuck me, how may prime ministers do we have to go through in the last 4 years

  15. cardinalb on

    We need someone who will put the country before everything

  16. fascinesta on

    Disappointing. I’m in the minority who approve of Starmer but McSweeney needs to be fed to the wolves over this and a multitude of other inept decisions/PR. Even ignoring the Mandelson thing, he’s absolutely shattered the bed as an advisor/spin doctor.

  17. judochop1 on

    It’s his faith in McSweeney why he’s not being as good as he could. I bet McSweeney vetoes labour from shouting about all the good policy achievements they’ve done.

    McSweeney is one of Mandelsons men ffs

  18. TrumpGrabbedMyCat on

    Can’t be that sorry about protecting a pedo’s BFF who leaked state secrets then can you Starmer?

  19. drewlpool on

    Morgan McSweeney must have something really juicy on Starmer…

  20. boringfantasy on

    Aaand that’s curtains. He’s out by the end of the month.

  21. noun_verbed on

    This is basically the kiss of death given the last several people he gave his ‘full confidence’ to

  22. MoleWhackSupreme on

    I’ve got full confidence Starmer performs yet another U turn and sacks McSweeney sooner rather than later

  23. TheLimeyLemmon on

    Well that’s a good way to accelerate both of you losing your jobs then I guess

  24. Any-Swing-3518 on

    Another day, another vindication for the Corbynites. I think we’re on a run of about 500 or something.

  25. Airurando-jin on

    I imagine that McSweeney has more loyalty to Mandelson than he does to Starmer, given Mandelson is a friend and mentor.

    It would mean that McSweeney’s opinion was biased and a conflict of interest.

    Given his former position, he may still have significant enough influence to also bring Starmer down, as he did with Corbyn.

    I would be intrigued to know if he has any other conflicts of interest, or is influenced by any large groups or donors , either acting in personal or national interest in their donation 

  26. Red_Brummy on

    The downfall of the Unionists in charge at Westminster would normally be hilarious if it did not involve so many innocent victims from around the world. Cannot even laugh at Sir Kid Starver defending the appointment of a close confident of a peado as US Ambassador who subsequently forwarded on (allegedly) information of national importance to them in between partying on peado islands and sending fawning emails and accepting huge sums of cash. Sigh.

    What an absolute clown-show the Unionists have been for for decades now. This is a shambles and as the press trawl those Epstein files, it’s only going to get worse.

    I wonder how Anas Sarwar feels about his close old friend now?! Has he U-Turned on that friendship?!

  27. BorderCollieDog on

    McSweeney will end up being to Starmer what Cummings was to Johnson… a fucking disaster.

  28. Impressive-Bird-6085 on

    I believe that this is a grave mistake. Given Labour is in such a terrible mess, and so deeply unpopular, the strategy to appease and lean in to Reform UK’s toxic division, toxic politics, and toxic rhetoric, much of which has reportedly been on the advice of, or largely down to Morgan McSweeney…. He should be sacked without hesitation!
    Labour and Starmer need a significant change of policy, policy direction and must find a compelling narrative about an improved country they want to help create and how their policies will achieve it!

  29. douggieball1312 on

    Morgan McSweeney: the Piers Gaveston of the Starmer government.

  30. Lucifer_606381 on

    Sorry but Keir signs things off. The fault lies wth him

  31. Woffingshire on

    Considering McSweeney was the main force behind appointing Mandelson, and the appointment of Mandelson is about to cost him his position, it’s a very odd move that he would say he has full confidence in the guy who pushed for this problem to happen.

  32. OkPhilosopher5308 on

    Starmer’s screwed, he’s a dead man walking, no matter how much ballast he throws over the side. The knives are out now.

  33. jeanclaudecardboarde on

    What I’d like to know is- now that we know that there *are actually* shadowy forces above the government that are actually calling the shots and we now know that it doesn’t matter what we vote for because it’s a done deal it seems- what is going to be done about all this now that we know that the game is up.
    Remember when the Illuminati was just a conspiracy theory? Seems they were there all along.

  34. Zeal0tElite on

    I’m glad that Starmer has spent all this time maneuvering himself into power, and got insanely lucky that the Conservatives collapsed right as he got into the leader of the Labour party, only to have it all collapse because he seems to be some kind of inverse idiot savant.

  35. totallyclips on

    But we don’t in you and that’s what really counts and matters

  36. Yorkshire_Roast on

    If Starmer said he had full confidence in me I’d start to panic

  37. RoastedPotato-1kg on

    bro it’s trying to make reform win, stupid decisions 

  38. urallbotsbtw on

    A clown government, even more pathetic than the last one.

Leave A Reply