La più grande minaccia per l’Europa non è un’invasione di Trump. È la sua rivoluzione politica globale | Marco Leonardo

European governments are terrified of Donald Trump’s threats on trade, Greenland and the future of Nato. But the biggest threat is not that Trump invades an ally or leaves Europe at the mercy of Russia. It is that his ideological movement could transform Europe from the inside.

A year after Trump’s return to the White House, his “second American revolution” is radiating outward into Europe. The Epstein files reveal how this began clumsily in 2018 with Steve Bannon; but it has become a much more sophisticated partnership with the second coming of Trump and the rise to power of JD Vance. The US National Security Strategy published by the White House in November called for strengthening the growing influence of “patriotic” European parties such as Reform UK, Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National (RN), Fidesz in Hungary and Vox in Spain. As with the communist movements of the cold war, these nationalist, populist and in some cases far-right parties are best understood not as isolated national phenomena but as expressions of a shared intellectual project – a movement that is, to varying degrees, now being reinforced by a foreign power.

The movement is often portrayed as backward-looking or reactionary, intent on restoring an imagined past. In reality, its strength lies in being radically contemporary – finely tuned to the political, social and intellectual conditions of the 21st century. I have spent the past 18 months trying to understand this movement, talking to everyone from bespectacled Hungarian intellectuals to freshly shaven young RN politicians in France, from Orthodox Jewish political philosophers to Maga diehards in the US. Based on this research, I am convinced that far from being lodged in the past, it is hyper-modern and its standard-bearers have a compelling analysis of the failings of liberal democracy and a pathway to power. Hence the designation “new right”.

Central to the movement’s self-understanding is the claim that liberalism has failed, along with the deeply interdependent globalised order it promoted after the cold war. In its telling, citizens have seen their national cultures and economies battered by an unbroken sequence of shocks that come from liberalisation: the global financial crash of 2008, the eurozone crisis two years later, the refugee crisis of 2015, the Covid pandemic in 2020, and the sharp rise in living costs following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Each crisis, it argues, has exposed the limits of liberal governance, overwhelmed state capacity and fuelled suspicion about whose interests governments were really serving. Governments rescued the banks, they point out, but cut welfare payments and let people’s homes be repossessed. Ordinary people paid the cumulative price of these crises – through lost jobs, strained services or rising bills – while elites were shielded from the consequences.

One of the most articulate exponents of this view is Benedikt Kaiser, accused of once moving in neo-Nazi circles, who has embraced electoral politics and is becoming one of the leading voices in the AfD’s intellectual ecosystem. Kaiser told me it was the convergence of these crises that had sapped the legitimacy of the postwar liberal order and mainstream parties, providing the essential opening for political insurgents to capture the political agenda.

No shit

Solve the mass migration problem and most of those far-right populist parties will disappear overnight.

Nice to see an article about this as an American living here.

Europe cannot underestimate how dangerous these people are. Groups like the Heritage Foundation are now publicly calling to dismantle the European Union. They are sending over lobbyists and donations and setting up think tanks. They look for people happy to break up Europe in exchange for their own little fiefdoms.

Look at the damage this movement did to the US in just one year. They are ruthless and do not care about rule of law or the common good. Ban them, dissolve their groups, or arrest them if they are taking foreign money. What is happening across the Atlantic can happen here.

Yes look at the EU, the right wing parties have reached agreements on everything with the neo-nazis.

I dont wanna see her disgusting face anymore…

I guess this article illustrates more about why there are people disillusioned by the political center.

>Borders became a tool for distinguishing the “real” members of the nation from outsiders.

That’s… what having a nation means? Every country does that. Does anyone seriously want to get rid of borders now?

>Tariffs were recast as a way to rebuild domestic production and elevate the dignity of work.

Why not? No, seriously: why not? If anything, the biggest weakness of the new right is they fail to have well designed industrial policies accompanying tariffs so that domestic production can be rebuilt. Like you know what time it is now right? Russia is a threat to EU and China is supplying Russia and you don’t think it’s nice to have domestic production?

And why leftists don’t think work has dignity?

>Foreign policy was stripped down to a narrowly defined national interest. 

A natural consequence of ignoring national interest in foreign policies. Nothing to be seen here really. You push and push and push with your refugee schemes and you expect people to be meek like sheep. Enough bullshit in foreign policies.

One may wonder how privileged Guardian journalists are to be able to write something like this.

Trust is earned. Institutions need to work to *earn* the trust of the general public. But accountability is a rare resources nowadays.