La BBC rimuove la cerimonia dei Bafta 2026 da iPlayer dopo la trasmissione di insulti razzisti
https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/culture/baftas-slur-2026-tourettes-bbc-iplayer-b2925744.html
di tylerthe-theatre
Tag
Austria
Belgio
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cechia
Croatia
Croazia
Czech
Czechia
Czech Republic
Danimarca
Denmark
Estonia
Europa
Europe
France
Francia
Germania
Germany
Grecia
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Irlanda
Polonia
Polska
Portogallo
Portugal
Regno Unito
Repubblica Ceca
Repubblica di Turchia
Romania
Serbia
Slovacchia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Svezia
Sweden
Turchia
Turkey
Ucraina
Ucraino
Ukraine
Ungheria
United Kingdom
26 commenti
The poor bloke, also How hard would it be to cut one word if it bothered em that much?
some people really are over sensitive cunts
The show isn’t even filmed live so this could’ve easily been avoided.
Absolutely shameful from the BBC and I feel awful for the people on stage and the person with Tourette’s who said it
Oh no! That’s going to disappoint literally dozens of people.
First off, obviously not the fault of the poor guy with tourettes.
Frankly astonishingly bad editing though. It’s not live iirc, and they edited out multiple political statements but just… chose to leave this in? Bizarre decision making.
I think they simply replaced the full version with an edited one, it wasn’t removed & is certainly there now.
Really feel that the BBC can’t win, whatever they do with this.
* If they leave it as aired, then they’re subjecting black people who want to watch it to racial abuse. And many will see the BBC as condoning it, or not appreciating how offensive it was.
* If they edit it out, or remove the programme entirely, then they’re effectively pretending that a disabled person doesn’t exist. That would be bad in any situation, but it’s *particularly* offensive for an awards ceremony that includes a film about this person’s life, and about getting people to accept his disability. The BBC is obviously quite big on being inclusive, and part of that message is not removing disabled people from view when they do something that they have no control over.
There’s no right answer here, beyond hoping that we can all be a bit compassionate to everyone involved.
Honestly, seeing this guy shout a racial slur is probably the only reason I’d ever watch the BAFTAs.
it’s obvious that the bbc should have edited it out of the original. leaving in the swearing is fine, but racial slurs are obviously extremely offensive and shouldn’t have been kept in.
also, pardon my ignorance but i’ve seen a lot of people saying that “black people are always meant to take racism on the chin”. assuming he’s apologised to the two presenters, is this not something that just has to be taken on the chin? what is the alternative, realistically, considering (i assume) he’s not *actually* racist, so he can’t be educated or punished? yes it’s hurtful and upsetting but it’s not like anything can be done about it?
thirdly, a lot of americans are calling for a public apology. why? surely a private apology is good enough. what does a public apology do apart from make the general public feel good? the BBC should be making the public apology for not cutting it out.
I don’t see why there’s so much uproar about this. It was fucking obviously not meant with any malice or intention and neither actor who heard it acknowledged it and kept the show moving.
Not saying it wouldn’t have been hurtful to the actors but they probably moved on from it by the time they went back to their hotels. As usual it’s the public and media whipping it up to be an ‘event’. 🙄
Yikes. That’s unfortunate for the poor bloke and Delroy Lindo and Michael B Jordan who must have been incredibly uncomfortable
I can see how this went down, There was a scrambled meeting at the BBC when it first happened but before it was broadcast debating whether to edit it out. With time short, they concluded editing it out might cause some pushback for silencing a tourettes sufferer, the protagonist of the film for which they were about to award best actor. This might be seen as invalidating the message of the film.
They broadcast it unedited. Shit hits the fan. There’s another meeting with a new shift manager yelling “why the fuck didn’t you doughnuts edit this out? Jesus Christ, useless the lot of you”.
I have a tic disorder and in the past I have had to go home from work because I couldn’t stop ticcing racial slurs. I can speak on this but it is still only my personal opinion based on my own lived experience. The BBC could have bleeped the tic and left in the apology by the host to provide context. Instead they took a route that degraded Delroy Lindo and Michael B Jordan and humiliated John Davidson.
Wendal Pierce who was on The Wire says:
> “The insult to them takes priority. It doesn’t matter the reasoning for the racist slur.”
It should when the reason is known otherwise it’s just ableism. You aren’t entitled to feel insulted by the presence of disabled people.
Cancel woke culture in 2026. I thought this shit died off years ago. This is why no one respects the left anymore.
Jamie Foxx is a moron. The damage people are doing to the cause of inclusion and representation is baffling. A lot of people openly showing if its not a black cause its not a cause they care about.
What was a humiliating experience for 3 people has been turned into an even greater spectacle by the BBC.
Ironic really. I would presume the point of the film is to engender understanding about the difficulty of living with the condition. However, there’s a hierarchy of social oppression and black is above disabled for many it would appear. It’s artistic almost, his life experience repeats, for the world to see.
The fact that white people cant say it but black people can is racist in itself
Humans really like to blow shit out of proportion. Theres way more important things going on in the world.
Shame the BBC didn’t do anything about all the nonces working for them
This hacks me off. The whole point of the excellent award winning film was to highlight how this poor guys life has been blighted by a lack of awareness of his condition, and associated bad reactions.
In an audience celebrating the success of the depiction the sufferer is then lambasted by the professionally offended for his “slur”
You can only hope that people learn from this media storm
I am actually shocked at the amount of Black folk that can’t seem to wrap their heads around this. I sound so racist (I am Black myself), but it’s literally other Black folk that can’t give this man any grace.
I am ashamed of the people in my community that are so ablist. We have a lot of work to do, but the sad thing is, the people who need to do the work won’t, because who they’re too busy crying “rasim”.
When I heard this happen, I was disgusted. I was ready to riot. But as soon as Alan came out and apologised, and I saw WHY this happened, my anger and hurt went away. I knew this man wasn’t racist. I know he said that because of his condition. He can’t help it, and he’s not racist.
He shouldn’t apologise for something he can’t help.
I understand that tics are involuntary, but what I don’t get – and maybe someone educated on the subject can explain – is why John Davidson’s tic in that moment just happened to be the N word when two black people were on stage? Was it purely coincidental or could the tic (the word used) be rooted to a belief that the person has?
No shade or anything, I just genuinely don’t understand!
Isn’t this discrimination towards someone with tourettes
Editing out Free Palestine but keeping racial slurs is a little on the nose, even for the BBC.
My take, for what it’s worth as a white bloke with no skin in the game, The guy with tourettes who shouted it out did nothing wrong, The BBC however who broadcast it when it was well within their power to cut it out are fully to blame
Is the Tourette’s thing really an excuse when it was directed specifically at black actors? That word shouldn’t even be in anyone’s vocabulary. I don’t think we should be giving this guy a pass, sorry