Share.

29 commenti

  1. Will backfire in kremlin’s face.

    vatniks moved on from being best NATO salesmen, to expanding, along with USA, to best nuclear weapons proliferation salesmen. And it’s only 2026.

  2. Just underlines the importance to get nuclear weapons for Finland.

  3. HighFlyingCrocodile on

    “Wait, this is not what we agreed on” How ffing hypocrite is that?

  4. Successful-Try-8506 on

    Sure, because abandoning their nuclear weapons worked out so well for Ukraine.

  5. IamInternationalBig on

    So what’s Russia gonna do, invade a NATO country?

    That would be the end of Russia.

    Sorry Russia, you are now irrelevant.

  6. PublicBetaVersion on

    You know you’re doing something wright when it makes Russia mad

  7. No-Intention-4753 on

    r/russiawarns yes yes, as always. Eat shit Putin, do not attack neighbors and you’ll never experience those defensive measures they put in place, simple as that. 

  8. BillyWillyNillyTimmy on

    This is the Russian equivalent of the Cuban missile crisis. I understand their panic.

    But as we’ve seen, their threats are completely empty, because they cannot afford to start a war with Europe (I do not count NATO as I believe the USA will refuse to come to aid due to Agent Krasnov).

  9. Consistent_Catch9917 on

    Mimimimi.

    We will aim nuclear weapons on you. Oh we already did, well we will aim them extra evily, so better look out …

  10. anders_hansson on

    Lots of people be like “Yeah that shows them!”, clearly without understanding how nuclear deterrence and nuclear tensions work. There’s good reason why nukes have not been placed closer to Moscow than in Italy (check the [map](https://brilliantmaps.com/where-nuclear-weapons-are-stored-in-europe/)), and that it has been part of the nuclear balance for over 50 years. The last time one of the two big nuclear powers put nukes too close to the other was in the 1960’s, and it almost started WW3.

  11. Stop invading innocent countries and there’s no need for nukes. Let’s not pretend Russia didn’t cause this themselves.

  12. Dustonred on

    Russia has no more leverage over this. The entire world remembers what happened to Ukraine after they gave them to Russia for security guarantees.

  13. Velcraft on

    I think Russia needs to realise that the potential nukes we might be getting wouldn’t be Russian ones, so backfiring isn’t a real concern.

  14. Wineandbikes on

    Don’t do what we don’t want you to do, otherwise we won’t like what you are doing…

  15. laulujoutsen95 on

    They are right, but Finland is now that defiant little shit that believes common sense is bad just because it’s said by Russia. We have all seen what has happened to the economy since the country started to participate in the EU sanctions. No longer any much-needed tax revenues from Russian tourism, exports, and beneficial oil & gas trade. Instead, the country is now accumulating debt like never before…

  16. fiendishrabbit on

    Should have thought of that Russia before you blatantly started breaking treaties and agreements with your neighbours.

    The war in Ukraine and the end of Finlandization is a prime example of the FAFO principle on an international level.

  17. LazyGandalf on

    Finland is not about to host nukes. That’s not what the change to the law is about.

  18. I think it’s only fair, Russia is hosting nukes on the other side of the border so this just balances things out.

  19. Many-Gas-9376 on

    It wasn’t a move to “host” nuclear weapons. Not going to comment further when even the headline is a lie.

  20. annewmoon on

    Don’t put up a fence and cameras or we will be forced to break into your home, meth head neighbor warns

  21. piercedmfootonaspike on

    To be fair, Kremlin is an expert in things backfiring.

  22. Anomuumi on

    Maybe don’t go invading your neighbors? They could stop today.

Leave A Reply