Share.

7 commenti

  1. realmbeast on

    look how fast we released these files….

    (looks at America)

  2. Puzzleheaded_Agent17 on

    Already a bad look for starmer. Surely now his time is up.

  3. Necessary-Product361 on

    Mandelson asked for £547,201 when he was sacked! The treasury then payed him £75,000. We payed him for him being friends with a convicted pedophile.

    Also it is important to note that the most serious documents will be being withheld “so not to prejudice the police investigation”.

  4. heresyourhardware on

    > Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is something Sir Keir Starmer has intimated he wasn’t aware of – but it’s clear in black and white, political editor Beth Rigby says.

    > “The prime minister had been warned in this Cabinet Office document about Jeffrey Epstein’s close relationship with Mandelson whilst he was in government,” she explains.

    > “What we are learning from this is what we knew, but to actually see it there that the prime minister, knowing about the general reputational risk, knowing about the continued relationship, that he put him into post anyway, that is going to play very, very badly.

    > “Particularly with his female MPs who were absolutely furious over the Mandelson revelations.”

    > Beth says the prime minister being “clearly warned” about the relationship and still proceeding to appoint Mandelson will be “deeply uncomfortable for him”.

  5. HaroldSaxon on

    The real scandal here is the links with Blair and Epstein.

    No wonder he came out in support of Iran and criticising Starmers reluctance to get involved.

    Surely at this point people need to see the pattern that the same people from the same group and the same links, using the same tactics as all of their campaigns are trying to do something to our democracy. Again.

  6. Simplyobsessed2 on

    Why are the government releasing this in batches? It is going to be damaging to them every time anything comes out. Do it all at once and get it over with. They have no political instinct whatsoever.

  7. beIIe-and-sebastian on

    Starmer claims he knew only about a limited connection but not the depth or continuing contact.

    These documents show that officials had already flagged ongoing links, reputational risks, and reports of close association before the appointment.

    Did Starmer lie or is he just the most gullible, incompetent, naive barrister and QC you’ve ever seen?

Leave A Reply