Crazy that the court just ducked the issue entirely.
The precedent set is that planning is irrelevant in the face of some public interest.
If the home office could get an emergency change use sure that’s a coherent position. To argue it’s not a change of use because of public interest is ridiculous.
SlightlyAngyKitty on
So where else would we house them? Besides the concentration camps most of this sub would prefer that is
2 commenti
Crazy that the court just ducked the issue entirely.
The precedent set is that planning is irrelevant in the face of some public interest.
If the home office could get an emergency change use sure that’s a coherent position. To argue it’s not a change of use because of public interest is ridiculous.
So where else would we house them? Besides the concentration camps most of this sub would prefer that is