Uno studente che ha fatto causa a una struttura di arrampicata su parete e al college per una caduta da un’altezza di 2,6 metri perde la richiesta di risarcimento danni

    https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/courts/2026/03/22/student-who-sued-wall-climbing-facility-and-college-over-26m-fall-loses-injuries-claim/

    di Bosco_is_a_prick

    Share.

    27 commenti

    1. Jlynch95 on

      Another absolute gobshite chancer who helps to limit the ability for literally anything remotely unique to exist in Ireland through extortionate insurance and the like. Delighted she gets nothing

    2. Thankfully they didn’t win or indoor climbing in Ireland would be dead.

      You sign all sorts of waivers saying that it’s a dangerous activity and you can get hurt doing it.

      RIP The Wall, no more climbing gyms in south Dublin 😭

    3. protoman888 on

      Every climbing facility I’ve ever been to requires a very comprehensive waiver form to be signed before climbing for this very reason.

    4. MightyMundrum on

      Stupid entitled greedy asshole. Even if they are thankfully getting no money, this will still affect wall climbing for others.

    5. thats_pure_cat_hai on

      2.6 million. What a fucking dose. Good on the judge.

      Edit. I am an idiot.

    6. ImprovementNo2185 on

      Glad he didn’t get anything in this case.

      Just out of curiosity, how come there are very rarely any news articles written about people with genuine and successful insurance claims? 

    7. Reading that, it sounds mad that it got that far – seems like a chancer, happy she lost the claim tbh. It’s like sticking your hand in a fire and then being shocked you got burnt

    8. yay-its-colin on

      “while Yates made a good functional recovery, she reports continuing symptoms including stiffness, cold sensitivity around the metalwork, and reduced running tolerance.”

      Replace metalwork with joints- this all happened to me between 2018 and 2026 too, but I put it down to me going from my 20s to my 30s.

    9. lmnopq10 on

      You take part in these activities at your own risk. It’s people like this that ruin it for everyone else by making claims and bring huge insurance costs to facilities that cater to these activities.

    10. singleglazedwindows on

      Honestly, some people should just play checkers.

    11. iHyPeRize on

      Correct judgement.

      There has to be large proportion of self responsibility with this type of thing, she knew what she was doing, knew the risks.

      Another chancer trying to take advantage

    12. UnemploydDeveloper on

      We really are turning into a nanny state with all this litigious behaviour.

    13. > The judge noted the indoor bouldering climbing facility has since closed.

      well there we go.

    14. AmazingUsername2001 on

      This sub is just becoming *The Irish Times* subscription sub. Can’t wait to get that JBL speaker….

    15. JackhusChanhus on

      Wankerage like this is why, when I intro a friend to bouldering, they pay €25 a pop for a college student to explain what I previously explained myself just fine.

    16. If she thought being allowed to climb a wall without training was worthy of a claim I’d love to see her reaction to going skiing.

      They let you loose onto the side of a mountain so long as you paid to be there.

    17. MightyMundrum on

      Does anyone know if the climbing facility closed specifically because of this entitled cunt? The article does not say.

    18. Rogue7559 on

      So the facility is closed. More than lolely because of this clowns lawsuit

    19. Didyouseethebubble87 on

      A risk assessment? A big fall is probably the main risk and the only way to mitigate for it is a harness or shut the place down.

    Leave A Reply