Amico, dov’è la mia privacy?: come una star di Hollywood esercita pressioni sull’UE per una maggiore sorveglianza
di juicythumbs
Amico, dov’è la mia privacy?: come una star di Hollywood esercita pressioni sull’UE per una maggiore sorveglianza
di juicythumbs
8 commenti
His stance on sexual abuse is kinda weird. Advocating on-behalf children but also advocating on-behalf the rapist Danny Masterson
Ashton Kutcher is so shady that even his character he play can’t really be trusted.
“The draft law, [unveiled yesterday in Brussels](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_2976), does not specify which technology must be used. Privacy advocates fear that in practice, the law could mean that most services will have to use client-side scanning, an intrusive technology that circumvents end-to-end encryption.”
Let me guess, Ai survaillance instead of providing honest customer support and have professionally schooled people have a look at questionable messages based of keywords and allow a whole anonymous system to exist in order to provide privacy and reasonable control over messages? Nah, gonna be full on spy-shit for the most possible control over human beings.
R.I.P. Trust.
The article is from 2022. Thankfully the EU parliament just voted against voluntary chat controls to my surprise
Isn’t he besties with Diddy?
Is he still involved? The article is from 2022.
Alarmists posting old articles from 2022
Ah, I get to trot out more context again. From [this thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/s/jU9cvXH5QY) a few months ago.
>One of the main thinktanks behind [various surveillance initiatives (ostensibly to protect children)] is the WeProtect Global Alliance, a broad alliance that includes governments, civil society, and the [private sector](https://www.weprotect.org/members/private-sector/). The origins of this org are, interestingly, US/UK – not Europe.
>One of the major private parties on this initiative is Thorn, Ashton Kushner’s org. They stand to benefit – they sell a solution.
>I have linked this quite a few times now – it is an investigative piece from 2023 that was published in several countries, and it digs a lot deeper into this question, though it does not have all the answers.
>[‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for Child Sex Content](https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content/)
Important to say that one of the older and more experienced NGO’s do not believe surveillance is a solution and say they are not being consulted. That is in the article.