Donna francese, 86 anni, trattenuta dall’ICE dopo essersi trasferita negli Stati Uniti per ricongiungersi con un amore perduto da tempo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd0rre4d9k0o
di diacewrb
Donna francese, 86 anni, trattenuta dall’ICE dopo essersi trasferita negli Stati Uniti per ricongiungersi con un amore perduto da tempo
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd0rre4d9k0o
di diacewrb
6 commenti
Got to get her out before she has that anchor baby. /s
Maybe the EU should demand all of their citizens be released or the US to face consequences. That’s what the US does
This has all the markings of a half decent film. (Not to make light of the situation) but the story has a lot of backstory. Hope it’s a happy ending.
The timeline is suspicious.
She was arrested just one day before a court hearing regarding the inheritance dispute, a hearing her lawyer believes she would have won.
According to the report and statements from her son, the stepson’s actions were aggressive and intended to force her out, he threatened and harrased her, he even cut off utilities to make her home uninhabitable.
Seriously, why do some people’s brain turns into a mush of raging monkey when it comes to inheritance disputes, do they have no sense of basic decency and decorum?
The way this was enforced seems excessive, but this headline is just shamelessly sad-fishing.
The underlying facts seem a lot more legally and socially complicated…
Personally, I can’t imagine trying to claim a share of someone’s inheritance after being married a year or less. At 86! Legal ambiguity or not, I wouldn’t feel so entitled to staying in the country or engage in a lawsuit with the person’s son.
I don’t understand the purpose of this post. Immigration enforcement is holding someone who is in the USA illegally? So what?