Yes, but not as reliable, the sun shines for 8 hours a day, in summer, the wind is very variable.
niemacotuwpisac on
What matters at the end is invoice to pay. Personally, I do not judge one or other better or worse. I just want low bills. So it is not crucial for my what is cheaper to build, but what makes my bills lower.
Qantourisc on
Is that with or without battery cost ? I’ll make a bet.
Adorable-Database187 on
Here we go again.
THZHazzard on
I haven’t noticed any difference in my electricity bills.
As always, someone is profiting from this, except the people.
Wooden_Republic_6100 on
If you need to change the thermometer… it means you’re not taking the temperature.
ExpertPath on
Another study shows solar doesn’t work at night
Auspectress on
That is good to hear. The cheaper the energy, the lower the bills, the more we can invest in heavy manufacturing, data centres, supercomputers, etc. What matters most.
I dream one day we, as a united can best utilise terrain of whole EU, not just a country. Denmark, Norway, Netherlands would be amazing for wind. Spain, Italy amazing for solar. Poland and France are amazing for nuclear. Switzerland and Austria are amazing for energy storage in water (artificial lakes).
We all need to work together to best utilise all things we have. In Poland we have good capacity for Solar, okay for wind, great for Nuclear but storage? Zero, no way. We will lose easily against Bhutan or Nepal on that front
diamanthaende on
No need for a “new metric” – this has been the case for ages. And since battery (and other) storage is becoming increasingly cheap and pretty much abundant (especially now that new cells types don’t even need Lithium), renewables are even more attractive.
It’s even possible for the average house owner to achieve a high degree of energy autarky these days without spending an arm and leg.
9 commenti
Yes, but not as reliable, the sun shines for 8 hours a day, in summer, the wind is very variable.
What matters at the end is invoice to pay. Personally, I do not judge one or other better or worse. I just want low bills. So it is not crucial for my what is cheaper to build, but what makes my bills lower.
Is that with or without battery cost ? I’ll make a bet.
Here we go again.
I haven’t noticed any difference in my electricity bills.
As always, someone is profiting from this, except the people.
If you need to change the thermometer… it means you’re not taking the temperature.
Another study shows solar doesn’t work at night
That is good to hear. The cheaper the energy, the lower the bills, the more we can invest in heavy manufacturing, data centres, supercomputers, etc. What matters most.
I dream one day we, as a united can best utilise terrain of whole EU, not just a country. Denmark, Norway, Netherlands would be amazing for wind. Spain, Italy amazing for solar. Poland and France are amazing for nuclear. Switzerland and Austria are amazing for energy storage in water (artificial lakes).
We all need to work together to best utilise all things we have. In Poland we have good capacity for Solar, okay for wind, great for Nuclear but storage? Zero, no way. We will lose easily against Bhutan or Nepal on that front
No need for a “new metric” – this has been the case for ages. And since battery (and other) storage is becoming increasingly cheap and pretty much abundant (especially now that new cells types don’t even need Lithium), renewables are even more attractive.
It’s even possible for the average house owner to achieve a high degree of energy autarky these days without spending an arm and leg.