Non so se sono troppo stupido, ma questi dipinti significano che è una pista ciclabile a doppio senso? Si trovano su tutte le piste ciclabili di Radom tranne probabilmente da Mieska I a Chrobrego Street. Onestamente non mi sembra giusto perché pensavo che le piste ciclabili fossero contrassegnate da linee, forse ci sto pensando troppo ma sul serio non voglio commettere errori così le altre persone si sentiranno a disagio È così in tutta la Polonia?
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1tkhlpg
di andesmapitas
15 commenti
Don’t worry, whole Poland doesn’t understand Radom in general.
Yes, you are overthinking. Bicycle lanes on pavement are in general 2-way unless it’s marked else.
I am Polish and I do not claim to fully understand it either, but I interpret it as 2-way lane due to the fact that bicycles painted on the ground are in 2 different directions. That, plus the fact that there is no indication of it being a one way lane, which I would expect to be there as a sign – in case it was one.
Striped lines divide the bike lane and sidewalk. Pictograms of bikes inquire the 2-way bike lanes.
It’s like that nearly everywhere, you should keep the right, but it is not as strict as for cars (obviously), like on escalators you should stand on the right and leave the left hand side for those walking or more often running.
Those pictured are two way. One bike symbol would also work… Bike symbol with chevrons (stacked ^^^) means it *is* one way though.
Don’t know about Radom ,but there are 1-way bike lanes in Wrocław, the painting of the bike is always pointed so that you see it upright and are B-2 signs installed on the lane at intersections so that you know you cannot ride the other way. Some people still ride against the flow, which is annoying, but won’t get you fined or anything.
Honestly, just look for the B-2 signs, if there are none, you’re fine.
I love them. I am from the US and we have no such infrastructure. These make it possible to bike anywhere and it’s friggen amazing
Bike lanes in radom are random
> Radom
Well, I think I found your problem. Welcome to Radom
to be continued…
There must be a blue sign C-13 to mark a cycling lane.
Same like this pedestrian crossing through the cycling line on the 3rd picture it’s not really a pedestrian crossing because there is no blue sign P-10. Many cities paint those white lines that looks like pedestrian crossings but not add P-10 signs.
Actually in the case of the 3rd picture there should be a sign C-13 | C-16 – blue sign with vertical light which marks on which side there is a pavement and a cycling lane.
The white signs here indeed show that this line is bi directional. They’re addition to the sign C-13 however they’re not defined in Kodeks Drogowy but in **Rozporządzenie Ministrów Infrastruktury oraz Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 31 lipca 2002 r. w sprawie znaków i sygnałów drogowych.**
**So there are some people that dispute if they are even legally binding which is another topic.**
**But yeah, generally speaking this means that’s a two way cycling lane – but remember they mean nothing if there is no blue C-13 sign.**
in Wroclaw I have at one place one sided lane; in one place in the middle it marked as two sided, and then – one sided again.
To understand bike lanes in Poland you have to know few things:
– Bike lanes are not made for bicyclists. They are designed to make use of EU and government funds in a way that allows decision maker’s friends and families to gain from them.
– Bike lanes in Poland are designed by people who have cycled for the last time when they were 8 and got a bike as a present for their first communion.
– Bike lanes are not meant to help cyclists. They are merely to get rid of cyclists from the roads, so drivers can have it all for them.
cuz radom