Zack Polanksi afferma che la BBC “ha permesso al miliardario di acquistare il Tempo delle interrogazioni” a causa di un panel sbilanciato
https://www.thenational.scot/news/26145850.bbc-accused-letting-billionaire-buy-question-time-ai-panel/?ref=ebbn&nid=1457&u=d9794c227b9ad312305a8232175f5f07&date=280526
di Cold-Monitor3800
16 commenti
[removed]
So all five panelists are pro-AI?
That is unbalanced yeah, whatever you think of Polanski.
It’s getting insane at this point. We can’t just allow special interests to control all of the national conversation.
[removed]
>“Many people believe that if AI is ever in full control, it will become an existential risk to humanity. I would argue the opposite,” Gawdat wrote on LinkedIn last month . “I believe there is enough evidence to suggest that when we fully hand over to AI, it may actually become our salvation.”
To be honest I’m much less worried about what the AI might do than I am about what the people who own it will do with it. There’s nothing inherently wrong with the technology itself, its just its being owned and utilised by the worst people on Earth.
I haven’t watched QT for about 5 years, its obviously being manipulated to make sure specific agendas get promoted.
I agree. You can see a massive difference in how Reform are treated the last year or so. Given so much time on the news, media…they had the same amount of MP’s yet get more coverage Greens, libs, often even more than the Tories. QuestionTime rarely goes a week without a Reform member on but will happily not have any Greens on for months
“Many people believe that if AI is ever in full control, it will become an existential risk to humanity. I would argue the opposite,” Gawdat wrote on LinkedIn last month . “I believe there is enough evidence to suggest that when we fully hand over to AI, it may actually become our salvation.”
I’m 100% up for an Iain M Banks style AI future. That’s the sort of thing all these guys have in mind right?
>”Many people believe that if AI is ever in full control, it will become an existential risk to humanity. I would argue the opposite,” Gawdat wrote on LinkedIn last month . “I believe there is enough evidence to suggest that when we fully hand over to AI, it may actually become our salvation.”
How is the BBC giving this lunatic a platform?
It’s a tv show about AI. Of course the experts are going to be involved in AI.
Why would you put Sharon from Folkestone on there to talk about something she knows nothing about?
Also everytime he says “billionaires” I just hear “cosmopolitan financiers”. Yeuch.
Rather than being hailed as a wonder for humanity, it’s being lauded by it’s exponents as a way to make even more money regardless of the consequences, hardly surprising folk are worried. ’Shall we help humanity? Nah just me me me thanks’
There is nothing stopping Mr Polanski from staging his own version of Question Time with a stronger panel.
I would suggest that he does so on a platform that is widely viewable
If he gave voices to everyone effected, his ratings would improve and humiliate the BBC
In other news water is wet, sky is blue and the sun is hot. BBC news and editorial is basically a rich right wingers plaything now, facilitated by 14 years of the Tories loading sycophants into senior positions.
Nothing says balanced like getting a complete pro AI guest line up. /s
Question Time is the reason why I’m now indifferent to whether the BBC survives in the modern age. It’s one reason to exist beyond all others is to provide news media not owned by billionaires but it hasn’t been able to do that for decades.
I just don’t know why the BBC is so dead set on platforming people who are running on defunding the BBC. Not these AI guys, but just referring to the other BBC stats about airtime vs seats represented