Share.

    2 commenti

    1. >While some protestors displayed violent behavior, the majority did not, making the police’s response excessive and disproportionate.

      Bold claim, I’d also love to see them give a solution that fits their views.

      You have violent behaviors in a crowd of protestors, the police are not a computer that can target violent people with lasers or something, the only way to stop the violence is either water jets or stun grenades in appropriate use.

      There’s also so many complications of this, if you’re a none violent protestor in a protest that has members acting in violence, and not doing anything about it makes you a complice.

      If people broke the park fence and you crossed the park fence, then you are one of those wanting to get into the parliament, which is also illegal, so again the police use force as trespassing or trying to trespass, or the more fitting, using force to get into parliament is nothing short of ignoring democratic votes, on other words, a coup.

      That said even if there’s a magical way to seperate the violent instigators from the rest with a few thousand more police, these people don’t go voluntarily, you can’t arrest them without the use of force and they would still make these articles crying about excessive force.

      Not once did they mention about throwing rocks that can potentially kill police or other civilians, not once about injured police. As i see it, the only people benefitting from democracy are the none democracy respecting people.

    2. Material_Alps881 on

      Violent protests aren’t protected anywhere 

      You see video of police from western european countries doing much much worse to violent protesters yet democracy watch is concerned for armenia 

      Wonder why …  💰 

    Leave A Reply