Il Seguro Social esercita molta pressione sulle persone da anni e dicono che dovresti pagare almeno 230 euro al mese se guadagni da qualsiasi attività economica. Non importa il tuo reddito. Quindi ho chiesto loro se creo un’app e vinco 60 euro all’anno, dovrei pagare 230 euro di previdenza sociale ogni mese? E loro hanno detto SI! Quindi ricorda! 60 euro di reddito da app all’anno impongono l’obbligo di pagare almeno 2760 euro di tasse previdenziali!!! e non infrangere le leggi! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 dopo aver chiesto perché la Spagna ha problemi economici.
https://i.redd.it/7126hekmhgoc1.jpeg
di Direct-Lengthiness-8
5 commenti
What is so difficult to understand? You have seguro social and you have to pay for it if you have an income.
If you make 60 euros a year you have way bigger problems than social security payments.
It can seem ridiculous, but it’s not a mistake. It is correct information. On the other hand, you receive the protection of social security. The system is not designed for small autonomo businesses at all.
The tax system does everything to squash investment and entrepreneurship.
Another small example, wanna sell your house and build a new house? Create a new taxable asset for them that is currently a piece of mud?
You have 2 years to apply the capital from the house you sell, to the new house or they see it as profit and tax you on it. It takes about 2 years *just* to design and get permissions, THEN start construction of 12-18 months.
Along the way you will have paid vat on everything, paid building permission taxes, then 10% vat on the construction + the 10% transfer tax on the land..
They’re worse than most governments because although a lot of others tax you to death, Spain makes it difficult for you to pay them to kill you (financially). You need a decent (expensive) tax lawyer to plan anything, usually years in advance.
Same as why do I need a gestor for everything?! Oh yeah, because they somehow have all the government appointments…
They gave you a generic answer (literally what the law says) and you, instead of interpret it, assume that it is literally your case, which is not.
If you don’t perform an activity in a “**routinely, personal and direct**” way you don’t have to be autónomo. Since your activity was **a one-time event** and the royalties generated are very low (there are sentences that say that you need to have some level of income for an activity to be considered “routinely”), you don’t need to be autónomo.