Immigrati da paesi terzi. Come si sta preparando l’Ucraina a resistere allo shock demografico?

    https://forbes.ua/money/immigranti-z-tretikh-krain-yak-ukraina-gotuetsya-vitrimati-demografichniy-udar-rozpovidae-nataliya-zaika-doslidnitsya-institutu-povedinkovikh-doslidzhen-v-american-university-kyiv-17052024-21213

    di vinny90x1234xx

    Share.

    2 commenti

    1. 203mm_4_pigdogs on

      This solution with immigrants didn’t work anywhere. Just a fucking idiotic idea people from undeveloped countries will have a same life values as people in your country. The only way in this situation its a giving a citizenship to foreign people which fighting for this country today

    2. thermalblac on

      Potentially falling into the same trap as UK, France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, etc. Short-term “solutions” that lead to long-term problems. Governments and the elites that control them are careful to avoid mentioning that large scale immigration policies are intended to suppress wages and potentially distract the populace – get the people to fight each other instead of directing their attention above.

      The governments of all developed countries are aware that their shrinking/aging workforce and population is fundamentally incompatible with the debt-based ponzi scheme monetary system which forms the basis of the global economy. Barring a traumatic/violent systemic reset, the monetary system essentially requires an infinitely expanding population which is not possible on a planet with finite habitability/resources.

      Ukraine has a chance to get their immigration policy right by learning from others. For instance Norway takes a limited number of migrants/asylumseekers/refugees from developing global-south countries per year and assigns them to municipalities equally throughout the country. Their social welfare benefits are tied to them staying in their assigned municipality. If they leave their assigned area, no more benefits. The policy is specifically designed to spread them out because putting everyone in the same place tends to form ethnic enclaves/ghettos which is 1) dangerous and 2) greatly reduces the chances they will successfully integrate. Spreading them out forces them to interact with society at large, learn the language and culture, and not retreat to a bubble. This is in contrast with Sweden’s disastrous results as they did not follow a similar policy.

      Limited, carefully vetted/screened/selected immigrants are always good. The US/Canada/much of Europe insisting on an open door policy of mass importing millions of culturally incompatible, uneducated and potentially hostile foreigners just because their business elites are complaining about labor shortages or falling commercial real estate valuations is bad.

    Leave A Reply