Ma che dire del Leopardo?
https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-abrams-better-than-russias-best-tanks-in-war-commander-2024-7?international=true&r=US&IR=T
di Fee-fi-fo-fum_
Ma che dire del Leopardo?
https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-abrams-better-than-russias-best-tanks-in-war-commander-2024-7?international=true&r=US&IR=T
di Fee-fi-fo-fum_
9 commenti
of course they are. ever heard of the Battle of 73 Easting?
the American Abrams tanks wiped the floor with Iraqis using T72-s.
regarding your question…the Leopard is just as good as the Abrams
The problem is it doesn’t really matter because they are being used as mobile assault guns and tank v tank combat is exceedingly rare. And when it does happen it’s at close range, which negates many of the Abrams advantages. Regardless, the Abrams is a much more survivable vehicle but it really can’t show it’s full potential under the current conditions.
Youtube experts have told me t-90 and t-72 is invincible in a toe to toe match against abrams
[deleted]
The modern Leopard 2’s are equivalent to the Abrams. Same gun, similar capabilities, and both have provisions made for crew survival (unlike Russian or Soviet tanks).
Soviet doctrine was that both the crew and the tank were replaceable. NATO doctrine is that the tank is easier to replace than an experienced crew.
I’m thoroughly convinced the US can easily take ruzzia with only Apaches and Abrams.
With the amount that was given and how vulnerable tanks are now to drones, that doesn’t matter *that much*
its a massive failure that we have not supplied hundreds more bradly/abrams.
They are not a commodity that we lack. When we stormed Iraq we had 5000 of them, Iraqi army was much less capable than the russian army that exists today.
what did we provide ukraine, like 30?
say what you want….America can blow up stuff