Il presidente della Finlandia sostiene il divieto del veto di un singolo Stato al Consiglio di sicurezza delle Nazioni Unite
https://united24media.com/latest-news/finlands-president-advocates-for-banning-of-single-state-veto-at-un-security-council-2414
di UNITED24Media
10 commenti
Never, _ever_ going to happen.
UN : Let’s ban veto !
Russia : Veto
China will always have putlers back.
What is the point of this proposal? It’s pretty obvious no one will give up the right to veto.
Interestingly, the US and Russia are now the only states to use the unilateral veto any more anyway.
China haven’t used theirs since the turn of the century, the UK since the early 70s, and France only once ever in 1976 (and haven’t used a veto, of any kind, since the late 80s anyway).
I think it the proposal will get vetoed. /s
no going to happen , their will be ww3 if it was removed
The more important question is: why is Ruzzia allowed a permanent seat in the Security Council?
Imagine if Nazi Germany had such a place during WWII…
It also doesn’t reflect todays geopolitical situation, where Russia isn’t even capable of defending its own borders – but seems to think if it as a “world power” that can just invade neighbouring countries at will…
Sorry. You locked yourself into this when you invited Russia. America and China to the council and gave them veto
Funnily enough people in this thread are saying changing it from one to two wouldn’t even change anything