I like how everywhere it’s extremely complicated, and then Iceland is just pure red, lol
tuxfre on
For a change, Greenland is “no data”…
kubanskikozak on
Wake up babe, new political compass just dropped
Mixed_not_swirled on
Honestly surprised my county is considered blue lol
SuddenGenreShift on
Proof of what we’ve all known all along: Norway is better than Sweden.
RockyMM on
Why is USA in the picture? /s
AmelKralj on
Norway is just the Switzerland of the Nordics
Deep_Space52 on
Hyper-concentrated map, damn.
Norway is apparently winning, Sweden and Denmark have problems, Finland has southern issues and a couple of problem areas in the north.
I’ve been assured by reliable sources that the Scandinavian countries are perfect and have maxed out ideal living. Have I been misinformed?
I want to say “there is no cow on the ice” in Swedish, but it seems like there are a few cows on the ice.
edit: google tells me that in Swedish it is *‘Det är ingen ko på isen’*
Fit-Factor-4789 on
I find it hilarious that Iceland is classified as low income.
Historical-Kale-2765 on
So basically.
Norway is fucking rich.
Sweden is Mid
In Denmark it’s good to be rich.
In Finnland there are a lot of poor people.
ContributionSad4461 on
I’m red, green would make a lot more sense at least for my town. Maybe it’s a lot worse inland?
Mirar on
Why is Danderyd grey… (Well done Järfälla, Vallentuna.)
Paper_Pusher8226 on
“Low income, low inequality”. So… everybody is just poor lol
TheMcDucky on
It’d be interesting to also show population by using low saturation for low population and high saturation for high population
AlpsSad1364 on
Norway is incredibly wealthy because of oil and also has no significant agricultural or low tech industries so they don’t need low income or migrant workers, they simply import most of their food (except fish) and goods. Unsurprisingly then inequality is low and incomes high.
I’m sure it’s great to live there but as model for the rest of the world it’s hardly repeatable.
IVII0 on
Can we get the same for eu?
aethralis on
I like that on all “nordic” maps there is a convenient corner to place the legend/data.
Hobbitfeet1991 on
I mean, it seems like who is following the Norwegian model the closest seems to be doing the best.
Norway always somehow looks good on any metric… has anyone ever seen a map where Norway isn’t among the best?
hungry-axolotl on
The power of oil money. And I wonder if Iceland is red because Olafur is making too much money from Youtube
Playful_Sense_2141 on
Is that only me who saw it ?
WorkingPart6842 on
One thing to note is that this is on a Nordic scale. Being ”poor” in the Nordics can still mean you’d be wealthy in some other European nation. For example, our mean income is 3700€ in Finland
25 commenti
Old data but I found the map interesting.
I like how everywhere it’s extremely complicated, and then Iceland is just pure red, lol
For a change, Greenland is “no data”…
Wake up babe, new political compass just dropped
Honestly surprised my county is considered blue lol
Proof of what we’ve all known all along: Norway is better than Sweden.
Why is USA in the picture? /s
Norway is just the Switzerland of the Nordics
Hyper-concentrated map, damn.
Norway is apparently winning, Sweden and Denmark have problems, Finland has southern issues and a couple of problem areas in the north.
I’ve been assured by reliable sources that the Scandinavian countries are perfect and have maxed out ideal living. Have I been misinformed?
I want to say “there is no cow on the ice” in Swedish, but it seems like there are a few cows on the ice.
edit: google tells me that in Swedish it is *‘Det är ingen ko på isen’*
I find it hilarious that Iceland is classified as low income.
So basically.
Norway is fucking rich.
Sweden is Mid
In Denmark it’s good to be rich.
In Finnland there are a lot of poor people.
I’m red, green would make a lot more sense at least for my town. Maybe it’s a lot worse inland?
Why is Danderyd grey… (Well done Järfälla, Vallentuna.)
“Low income, low inequality”. So… everybody is just poor lol
It’d be interesting to also show population by using low saturation for low population and high saturation for high population
Norway is incredibly wealthy because of oil and also has no significant agricultural or low tech industries so they don’t need low income or migrant workers, they simply import most of their food (except fish) and goods. Unsurprisingly then inequality is low and incomes high.
I’m sure it’s great to live there but as model for the rest of the world it’s hardly repeatable.
Can we get the same for eu?
I like that on all “nordic” maps there is a convenient corner to place the legend/data.
I mean, it seems like who is following the Norwegian model the closest seems to be doing the best.
…Rest of the world, hello?
https://www.oslo.kommune.no/english/welcome-to-oslo/norwegian-society/the-norwegian-model/
I think about rural Swedes a lot.
Yay for living in a red dot surrounded by blue
Norway always somehow looks good on any metric… has anyone ever seen a map where Norway isn’t among the best?
The power of oil money. And I wonder if Iceland is red because Olafur is making too much money from Youtube
Is that only me who saw it ?
One thing to note is that this is on a Nordic scale. Being ”poor” in the Nordics can still mean you’d be wealthy in some other European nation. For example, our mean income is 3700€ in Finland