Trent’anni fa, gli Stati Uniti persuasero l’Ucraina che non aveva bisogno delle armi nucleari e le diedero “garanzie di sicurezza”. Oggi gli Stati Uniti stanno convincendo l’Ucraina a rinunciare ai territori, a dimenticare l’adesione alla NATO e ad abbassare l’età della leva.

    Thirty years ago, the United States persuaded Ukraine that it does not need nuclear weapons and gave Ukraine "security assurances." Today, the United States is persuading Ukraine that it needs to give up territories, forget about NATO membership, and lower the conscription age.

    Andreas Umland (@umland.bsky.social) 2025-01-18T06:11:25.247Z



    di CapKharimwa

    Share.

    7 commenti

    1. Alaric_-_ on

      Ukraine: “Wait, what’s this 4th point about Security Council?”

      russia: “So we guarantee that we don’t ‘*attack you*’ and if we do, you have to complain at Security Council, where we have Veto.”

      USA: “Yeah, don’t worry about it! It’s all good!”

      russia: “Yeah, just sign it quick and don’t think about it!”

      Ukraine: “I got a bad feeling about this…..”

    2. NolAloha on

      This is one of Bill Clinton’s major achievements. Done at about the same time as he agreed to chopping up a bunch of perfectly good nuclear submarines.

    3. PitifulEar3303 on

      But according to “experts”, UKR does not have the money, resources or people to maintain its nuclear arsenal?

      I call bullshyt though, because it’s relatively easy for UKR to maintain a dozen or so basic Uranium warheads, as they don’t require the super expensive and intensive maintenance of modern tritium warheads.

    4. litbitfit on

      Almost every country the military service **(COMPULSORY)** age is at 18. This is **compulsory** enlistment. There’s a big difference between enlistment (voluntary) and enlistment (**compulsory**) and those are **compulsory**

      Even countries who don’t have an expansionist neighbor. Only Ukraine is 25 and above. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_enlistment_age_by_country](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_enlistment_age_by_country)

      Even if you don’t send the 18-20 years old to the front, they should be trained and ready, it is only fair to the nation and the people.

    5. Tequilla7sunset on

      It was different time. We must learn our lessons and try to not repeat the mistakes that had been made.

    6. YesManSky on

      Never let another country (s) dictate your future. Always have a few nuclear tipped ICBMs in your arsenal

    7. cuppachuppa on

      The US is persuading Ukraine to give up territory? I’ve not heard that.

    Leave A Reply