Il giudice avverte che le prove di Google Translate sono “sentito dire” nel caso di guida in stato di ebbrezza

    https://www.independent.ie/regionals/tipperary/news/judge-warns-that-evidence-from-google-translate-is-hearsay-in-drink-driving-case/a1531522210.html

    di jklynam

    Share.

    6 commenti

    1. So, drunk, no licence, driving badly, and we’re worried that the arresting officer tried to communicate with him using google translate. How about get the fuck out of here if you’re incapable of following basic laws instead of suing the state for badly translating for you

    2. mrlinkwii on

      legally this is correct since google translate can be wrong

    3. pablo8itall on

      There’s no way you want your legal rights fed to you through AI app rubbish.

      Get humans in there to translate please.

      Judge is right to call that out as bullshit.

    4. helphunting on

      Jesus… guilty or not, if I’m in some foreign country and I’ve been arrested for something, I hope to fuck they give me a proper translator.

      I’ve tried to communicate in difficult situations with Google Translate, and it’s a fucking shit show

    5. theseanbeag on

      Bit of an odd point to raise in a drink driving case. No oral evidence from the defendant would generally be used in evidence. They are either over the limit or they aren’t.

    6. Nihilistka_Alex on

      All garda stations and courts have a contract with the biggest interpreting agency they can call at any time and unless it is an extremely rare language, they will get an interpreter in person or on the phone within a few hours. These interpreters are bound by oaths and contracts in regards to confidentiality and accuracy. Google translate, on the other hand, can be and often is innacurate and has no context for the situation. I know who I’d rather trust with my criminal record

    Leave A Reply