Yet 99.99999% of drivers will not be caught doing 35 in a 30 or 65 in a 60.
supreme_mushroom on
Correction: People speeding may be hit with fines, but let’s be honest, they won’t be because enforcement is low.
Charming-Tension212 on
No enforcement leads to no change.
Britterminator2023 on
Racket
SomeNameForThisLogin on
Because soooooo many people die in suburbia on 50km roads. Most of it is Single Vehicle Accidents on rural roads at 2am
Melodic-Chocolate-53 on
Anything but enforcing the limits that are there already.
adjavang on
Is this not just cork/galwaybeo nonsense? More sensationalist nonsense from a blog masquerading as a news site.
Yes, obviously people speeding may get speeding fines. Shocking news.
poochie77 on
2 people wrote that? Jesus christ.
Low-Albatross-313 on
If half of this countries laws were enforced we wouldn’t need the other half!
It seems to be an Irish solution to people ignoring speed limits, introduce even lower limits so people can ignore them as well.
slevinonion on
This will definitely lead to more deaths. Increasing overtaking because limits are not realistic will cause more accidents and create apathy to all speed limits.
There are 3 main classes of local road. Primary (2 lane), secondary (narrow give and take) and tertiary (boreen). Local primary roads shouldn’t be included.
Jack chambers should be ashamed for a blatant populist idea at the time. He isn’t a road safety engineer and is getting advice from the RSA who have NO road safety engineers. Whole idea needs reversing.
funderpantz on
It’s really very simple and it comes down to physics.
1. Slower speeds allow for reduced braking distance which allows for the avoidance of collisions
2. Objects colliding at lower speeds do not have as severe outcomes as those colliding at higher speeds
Ye can argue all you want but you will not change those points.
Anyone wanting to know future changes which are also coming should review the Road Safety strategy documents available on the RSA site.
The reduced speed limits are only 1,tiny element, of the changes to come.
eamonndunphy on
Friendly reminder that reducing obesity by 1% would save as many lives as reducing road deaths to zero.
Irks me how much air time road deaths get compared to other (far more prominent) causes.
DeathDefyingCrab on
Sorry, has everyone seen the videos of the young lads on scramblers driving all over the road infront of Gardaí. I’ve also seen all the videos of drivers breaking red lights on another sub-reddit. I know speed kills and all that but….can’t help but feel this was low hanging fruit to look busy.
Wise_Adhesiveness746 on
This is more to do with revenue raising,than road safety
How many crashes happen on main roads between 80-99KPH?….why is everything done arseways here😓
Alastor001 on
That will save so many lives…
sneakyi on
Nonsense.
martyc5674 on
Are they changing any signage? There’s a lot if 80 signage out there.
ashfeawen on
Will all the signs be changed in time, do you think?
JourneyThiefer on
What makes a road primary vs secondary?
Brilliant_Work_1576 on
Fuck it, go the whole hog and ban private automotive transport if zero road deaths is the aim?
20 commenti
I’m shocked so I am.
Yet 99.99999% of drivers will not be caught doing 35 in a 30 or 65 in a 60.
Correction: People speeding may be hit with fines, but let’s be honest, they won’t be because enforcement is low.
No enforcement leads to no change.
Racket
Because soooooo many people die in suburbia on 50km roads. Most of it is Single Vehicle Accidents on rural roads at 2am
Anything but enforcing the limits that are there already.
Is this not just cork/galwaybeo nonsense? More sensationalist nonsense from a blog masquerading as a news site.
Yes, obviously people speeding may get speeding fines. Shocking news.
2 people wrote that? Jesus christ.
If half of this countries laws were enforced we wouldn’t need the other half!
It seems to be an Irish solution to people ignoring speed limits, introduce even lower limits so people can ignore them as well.
This will definitely lead to more deaths. Increasing overtaking because limits are not realistic will cause more accidents and create apathy to all speed limits.
There are 3 main classes of local road. Primary (2 lane), secondary (narrow give and take) and tertiary (boreen). Local primary roads shouldn’t be included.
Jack chambers should be ashamed for a blatant populist idea at the time. He isn’t a road safety engineer and is getting advice from the RSA who have NO road safety engineers. Whole idea needs reversing.
It’s really very simple and it comes down to physics.
1. Slower speeds allow for reduced braking distance which allows for the avoidance of collisions
2. Objects colliding at lower speeds do not have as severe outcomes as those colliding at higher speeds
Ye can argue all you want but you will not change those points.
Anyone wanting to know future changes which are also coming should review the Road Safety strategy documents available on the RSA site.
https://www.rsa.ie/about/safety-strategy-2021-2030#
The reduced speed limits are only 1,tiny element, of the changes to come.
Friendly reminder that reducing obesity by 1% would save as many lives as reducing road deaths to zero.
Irks me how much air time road deaths get compared to other (far more prominent) causes.
Sorry, has everyone seen the videos of the young lads on scramblers driving all over the road infront of Gardaí. I’ve also seen all the videos of drivers breaking red lights on another sub-reddit. I know speed kills and all that but….can’t help but feel this was low hanging fruit to look busy.
This is more to do with revenue raising,than road safety
How many crashes happen on main roads between 80-99KPH?….why is everything done arseways here😓
That will save so many lives…
Nonsense.
Are they changing any signage? There’s a lot if 80 signage out there.
Will all the signs be changed in time, do you think?
What makes a road primary vs secondary?
Fuck it, go the whole hog and ban private automotive transport if zero road deaths is the aim?