But no, wait….that would be way to easy….got it. Let`s look for a more difficult solution….yep…thats better (for Putler).
It`s so hard to not get mad about that.
amitym on
I’ve got to say, of their proposed areas of focus, one stood out to me:
* Preventing the aircraft from reaching the launch line (interception, neutralization)
Pretty simple concept: no launch platform, no bombs today. And no bombs tomorrow or next week either.
Unfortunately I fear that is not cutting-edge enough for these planners. They want “non-traditional methods.” Air defense suppression followed by interception is, alas, very traditional.
obidobi on
JAS 39 Gripen planes that can be dispersed closer to the front with fast refueling and rearming on roads. Together with AWACS and meteor missiles they should push back the bombers!
Just let Sweden deliver the systems! They have been ready for delivery for over half a year, just need permission.
4 commenti
May I help to find a solution?
T A U R U S !!!!
But no, wait….that would be way to easy….got it. Let`s look for a more difficult solution….yep…thats better (for Putler).
It`s so hard to not get mad about that.
I’ve got to say, of their proposed areas of focus, one stood out to me:
* Preventing the aircraft from reaching the launch line (interception, neutralization)
Pretty simple concept: no launch platform, no bombs today. And no bombs tomorrow or next week either.
Unfortunately I fear that is not cutting-edge enough for these planners. They want “non-traditional methods.” Air defense suppression followed by interception is, alas, very traditional.
JAS 39 Gripen planes that can be dispersed closer to the front with fast refueling and rearming on roads. Together with AWACS and meteor missiles they should push back the bombers!
Just let Sweden deliver the systems! They have been ready for delivery for over half a year, just need permission.
Destroy russian military airport?