Share.

    19 commenti

    1. GodsBicep on

      Whilst I agree that AI shouldn’t take away profits from creatives, it’s funny that they’ve gone on such a coordinated effort about it when these papers are responsible for shaping public opinion politically in a way that has taken from the people.

    2. ExotiquePlayboy on

      For some of us, we welcome AI. I’m using AI pretty much every day now. And AI can help create websites, apps, software, etc. so I no longer need to pay some coder that’s going to charge me a ridiculous amount.

      Yes, AI is bad for coders & programmers as it will mean job losses. But remember when cars were invented? I’m sure horse carriage drivers, jockeys, breeders, etc. were upset but they adapted.

    3. The fundamental problem they have is in convincing a court AI learning from training data is any different to a Human learning by seeing / hearing it.

      Without that, either result seems to shatter copyright. Court sides with artists, now copyright is extended to a draconian degree where you can claim copyright infringement simply by proving someone ever listened to your music and public support will collapse. Court sides with AI, anyone can play with a generator with total immunity, copyright becomes worthless almost over night.

      And I just don’t think thats a demonstratably reasonable position – we have no real understanding of how Human learning works, only that machine learning is based on some of our best guesses. Which at best seems to make the contention that they are different a legal fiction.

    4. FeelingMassive on

      The Luddites were right. Technology helps concentrate wealth into the hands of those that own the means of production, rather than those that produce the value.

      AI gives the wealthy access to the skills, without letting the skilled access the wealth.

    5. thebear1011 on

      I live in the UK and subscribe to two online papers (including one in this image) and only just known about this from this post! Goes to show how easy it is to miss whatever is in print papers.

    6. -------7654321 on

      AI, Robotics and Automation broadly require a complete new thinking of work life and society. In its utmost consequence it is a total transformation of what we understand by labour.

    7. mainhattan on

      You can’t (yet) sell ads on CrapGPT responses. I’m sure it’s coming though.

      Journalists didn’t evolve with the times and move on from their own focus on selling ads, even when Google started beating them at their own game.

      And the media allowed governments to enable a totally unregulated trashfire known as the WWW (Internet) and antisocial media.

      Megaplagriarism is just the logical extension of the already highly plagiaristic media.

    8. Glory4cod on

      AI will not accelerate decision-making but will greatly boost the efficiency of drafting and implementing the plan when a decision is made.

      Modern military are working on AI weapon systems. The system will automatically identify enemies’ targets and provide a priority list to commander. The commander can choose which targets should be fired upon, and AI will automatically distribute firing power to them.

      Unfortunately, most of us here are merely tools and functionalities. We don’t have the call in our work.

    9. Fabulous_Top9281 on

      Great to see – lots of voices, loads of diversity. The free market at work.

    10. LordAmras on

      I like how some newspaper had to point out that the regular paper was inside because their readers would be too dumb to understand it otherwise

    11. I propose a simple fair use exemption for AI: Allow training on copyrighted works as long as the model is not generative.

    12. Little-Low-5358 on

      I agree. I hope this succeeds and a good law is passed preventing this to happen.

      But if not: rebellion.

    13. utsuriga on
    Leave A Reply